E40 Process Jobs + E94 Control Jobs + E30 communication state

GEM300 layer: SEMI E40-0705 Process Job and E94-0705 Control Job
state machines, plus the E30 §6.1 communication-state machine that
sits between HSMS SELECT and full GEM communication. Data-driven
via data/process_job_state.yaml and data/control_job_state.yaml,
mirroring the existing control_state.yaml pattern.

Wire coverage:
  S14F9/F10   CreateObject (CJ)              host -> equipment
  S14F11/F12  DeleteObject (CJ)              host -> equipment
  S16F5/F6    PRJobCommand                   host -> equipment
  S16F9       PRJobAlert                     equipment -> host
  S16F11/F12  PRJobCreate (simplified body)  host -> equipment
  S16F13/F14  PRJobDequeue                   host -> equipment
  S16F27/F28  CJobCommand                    host -> equipment

Process Job FSM exposes 8 states matching PRJOBSTATE bytes (E40 §10.3.2);
HOQ is reorder-aware (move-to-head against an insertion-order vector);
Stop/Abort on a Queued PJ routes through ABORTING so the host observes
PRJOBSTATE=7 on the wire (§6.3); alert_enabled is settable per-PJ for
PRALERT control; FSM dispatches through ProcessJobStore::on_change_
dynamically so a late set_state_change_handler() reaches existing PJs.

Hardening: loader rejects NoState (sentinel) as initial/from/to and
rejects `on: created` rows; static_asserts pin enum values to wire
bytes; ProcessJobStore is non-movable to keep the per-PJ this-capture
safe.

Server simulator cascades the full CJ -> PJ lifecycle on CJSTART so
the wire trace exercises every legal state. CEIDs 400/401 fire on CJ
state changes via the existing event-report pipeline.

Tests: 60+ new assertions across test_process_jobs, test_control_jobs,
test_communication_state, test_hsms_connection, plus loader and
messages round-trip coverage.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-06-07 21:00:32 +02:00
parent 1f67aad985
commit 90c177b7ce
33 changed files with 3122 additions and 62 deletions
+30
View File
@@ -87,3 +87,33 @@ TEST_CASE("frame decode rejects short payload") {
std::vector<uint8_t> tooShort(5, 0);
CHECK_THROWS_AS(Frame::decode(tooShort.data(), tooShort.size()), FrameError);
}
TEST_CASE("E37 SType / status / reject-reason wire values") {
// SType (E37 §8.3). Defined set is {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,9}.
CHECK(static_cast<uint8_t>(SType::Data) == 0);
CHECK(static_cast<uint8_t>(SType::SelectReq) == 1);
CHECK(static_cast<uint8_t>(SType::SelectRsp) == 2);
CHECK(static_cast<uint8_t>(SType::DeselectReq) == 3);
CHECK(static_cast<uint8_t>(SType::DeselectRsp) == 4);
CHECK(static_cast<uint8_t>(SType::LinktestReq) == 5);
CHECK(static_cast<uint8_t>(SType::LinktestRsp) == 6);
CHECK(static_cast<uint8_t>(SType::RejectReq) == 7);
CHECK(static_cast<uint8_t>(SType::SeparateReq) == 9);
// Select.rsp status (E37 §7.2).
CHECK(static_cast<uint8_t>(SelectStatus::Ok) == 0);
CHECK(static_cast<uint8_t>(SelectStatus::AlreadyActive) == 1);
CHECK(static_cast<uint8_t>(SelectStatus::NotReady) == 2);
CHECK(static_cast<uint8_t>(SelectStatus::ConnectExhaust) == 3);
// Deselect.rsp status (E37 §7.4).
CHECK(static_cast<uint8_t>(DeselectStatus::Ok) == 0);
CHECK(static_cast<uint8_t>(DeselectStatus::NotEstablished) == 1);
CHECK(static_cast<uint8_t>(DeselectStatus::Busy) == 2);
// Reject reason (E37 §7.7).
CHECK(static_cast<uint8_t>(RejectReason::StypeNotSupported) == 1);
CHECK(static_cast<uint8_t>(RejectReason::PtypeNotSupported) == 2);
CHECK(static_cast<uint8_t>(RejectReason::TransactionNotOpen) == 3);
CHECK(static_cast<uint8_t>(RejectReason::EntityNotSelected) == 4);
}