C9 — the flagship vendor example now demonstrates the intended integration
shape. examples/pvd_tool/main.cpp: 1093 -> 570 lines. The 466-line
hand-registered handler section and the hand-wired Server/Router/emit
plumbing are gone, replaced by EquipmentRuntime + register_default_handlers
(the example now serves all 56 handlers, up from its hand-picked 51) +
commands.set_handler for the START-runs-the-recipe behaviour (was a
hard-coded S2F41 router override). All domain logic — sensor simulator,
recipe runner, alarm threshold monitor, EPT cycler, Prometheus gauges —
unchanged. pvd's SVIDs 1/2 and CEIDs 400/401 match the roles: defaults, so
the built-ins bind with no config change. Verified: builds clean, boots
("registered 56 handlers", config loaded, EPT cycling), HSMS :5000 accepts,
metrics :9090 answers HTTP 200. logfn flushes per line so docker/CI logs
are visible immediately.
Writing project — new tutorial chapter docs/42_vendor_daemon_and_clients.md:
why a daemon (the host-timer argument), the proto contract and the HCACK-4
command semantics, the Python client walkthrough, EquipmentRuntime +
capability registration + roles:, the threading contract (posting API /
read_sync / hooks-on-io-thread) and primary-vs-observer slots, and a
which-tier-do-I-pick table. Indexed in 00_index Part 4. Refreshed the three
spots that still described pvd_tool's old "51 handlers in ~460 lines" shape
(ch35, ch41, pvd README) — drift killed in the same commit that made it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
7.1 KiB
ACME-PVD-3000 — worked vendor example
A fictional Physical Vapor Deposition tool, end-to-end. This is what a real tool integrator's deployment looks like:
equipment.yaml— the tool's data dictionary (29 SVIDs, 5 DVIDs, 7 ECIDs, 21 CEIDs, 12 alarms, 3 recipes, 9 host commands)main.cpp— the vendor application: sensor simulator, recipe runner, alarm threshold monitor, EPT cycling, metrics exporter, Router handlers wiring it all to the wire.
If you're starting a real integration, fork these two files and customize. They're written to be a template, not an abstract demo.
What it demonstrates
| Section in main.cpp | What it shows you how to do |
|---|---|
| §1 Helpers + constants | The few kSvidX / kCeidX constants worth pinning at file scope |
| §2 Sensor simulator | Multi-cadence sensor poll loops (10 Hz pressure, 1 Hz temps), with the asio::post-onto-strand thread-safety pattern |
| §3 Recipe runner | Driving a PJ through SettingUp → Processing → ProcessComplete by walking the recipe body, with per-step CEID emission |
| §4 Alarm threshold monitor | Continuous threshold-based alarm logic (chamber pressure, cleaning interval) with set/clear emission |
| §5 EPT cycling | E116 state transitions driven by PJ state + safety alarms |
| §6 main() | EquipmentRuntime + register_default_handlers (all 56 GEM handlers in one call) + commands.set_handler for the START behaviour |
| §7 main() | Loading YAML → validating → composing → running, including the Prometheus exporter on :9090 (§7.3) |
Running it
From repo root:
# Validate the configs (this is what your CI should do).
docker compose run --rm builder /app/build/secs_server --validate-config \
--config /app/examples/pvd_tool/equipment.yaml \
--state-table /app/data/control_state.yaml \
--pj-state-table /app/data/process_job_state.yaml \
--cj-state-table /app/data/control_job_state.yaml
# Start the tool.
docker compose run --rm builder /app/build/pvd_tool \
/app/examples/pvd_tool/equipment.yaml \
/app/data/control_state.yaml \
5000 \
9090
# In another shell, drive it with the conformance harness or a real host.
docker compose run --rm builder /app/build/secs_conformance \
--host 127.0.0.1 --port 5000 --device 0
# 47 / 47 checks passed
Or via Docker Compose if you'd rather wire it as a service.
What the host sees
Once a host connects and SELECTs:
- S1F1 → S1F2 returns
MDLN="ACME-PVD-3000",SOFTREV="1.4.2". - S1F3 on the 32 SVIDs returns live sensor readings — chamber
pressure tracks the simulator's target (default 1e-7 Torr in
idle), wafer counter increments per processed PJ, EPT state
gauge says
Standby. - S2F33/F35/F37 binds dynamic event reports; CEIDs 300 / 301 / 310 / 311 fire on real PJ activity.
- S2F41 RCMD=START kicks the recipe runner: any PJ in WaitingForStart transitions to Processing and the simulator starts tracking the recipe's step targets. Sensor values change in real time. CEID 300 (ProcessStarted) emits, then per-step CEID 310/311, then CEID 301 (ProcessCompleted) on completion.
- S2F41 RCMD=FAULT sets alarm 4 → S5F1 emitted (if enabled via S5F3 first).
- S7F19 lists the 3 recipes; S7F5 returns the body (multi-line STEP definitions).
- S16F11 (PJ create) + S14F9 (CJ create) + S16F27 (CJSTART) drives the full E40/E94 lifecycle.
What's the same as the secs-gem demo server
apps/secs_server.cpp (used by docker compose up server) is the
canonical fully-loaded server. This example is structurally a
slimmer fork:
- Same Router pattern (
gem::Router+router.on(s, f, [...])) - Same event/alarm emission helpers (
deliver_or_spool,emit_event,emit_alarm_set) - Same control-state-change handler wiring
What this example adds that the demo doesn't:
- Sensor simulator with multi-cadence poll loops. The demo's SVID values stay at their YAML defaults; PVD's drift toward recipe-step targets.
- Recipe runner that parses the recipe body and drives the PJ FSM step-by-step. The demo's RCMD=START just emits the linked CEID; PVD actually walks the recipe.
- Alarm threshold monitor — continuous evaluation of sensor values against ECID setpoints. The demo only fires alarms when RCMD=FAULT is sent.
- EPT cycling — automatic Standby↔Productive↔UnscheduledDowntime based on PJ + alarm state. The demo doesn't cycle EPT.
- Prometheus metrics exporter on a second port. The demo logs but doesn't export.
If you want one of these patterns in your own tool, lift the code
from main.cpp directly — each section is independently usable.
What's not here
- Persistence. The demo server's
--spool-dirflag is the pattern to copy. Addmodel->spool.enable_persistence(...)etc. at startup before binding the port. Seedocs/INTEGRATION.md§5. - E84 handshake timers. No load-port AMHS wiring; see
docs/INTEGRATION.md§4.6 for theE84AsioTimersadapter. - Real I/O bridges. Sensor values come from a random-walk
simulator. A real PVD tool would have a PLC/serial driver
module-bridge feeding
model->svids.set_value(...)from real hardware. - Production deployment hardening —
docs/SECURITY.md(nftables, stunnel, minisign signing) anddocs/INTEGRATION.md§7 (HA pattern).
What you'd change for your tool
- Replace
equipment.yamlwith your tool's actual SVIDs, ECIDs, alarms, recipes. Runsecs_server --validate-configafter every edit. - Replace the sensor simulator (
pvd::Simulator) with calls into your real hardware driver. Keep theasio::postpattern for cross-thread updates. - Replace the recipe runner with your real recipe engine
integration. The shape — fire
Start, walk steps, fireProcessComplete— is the contract; the implementation is yours. - Replace the alarm threshold monitor with your real
alarm sources (sensor interrupts, watchdog timers, hardware
fault lines). Same
emit_alarm_set / emit_alarm_clearAPI. - Keep most of the Router handler section — those are spec- defined and you'll need them all in production.
That's it. No framework, no DI container, no abstract base classes. ~1,100 lines of vendor code on top of the library.
Cross-references
docs/INTEGRATION.md— the conceptual tutorial this example concretizesdocs/ARCHITECTURE.md— how stores compose, how to extenddocs/BENCHMARKS.md— what the throughput envelope looks likedocs/SECURITY.md— production hardening configsapps/secs_server.cpp— the demo server's fully-loaded Router (every handler PVD inherits + a few more)