EquipmentRuntime::read_sync establishes THE pattern for reading mutable engine state from gRPC/binding threads (Phase 0 item 6): post the read onto the io thread (the model's single owner), wait on a future with a deadline, nullopt => UNAVAILABLE at the RPC edge. Always truthful, no cache to invalidate; milliseconds are irrelevant at SECS rates. GetVariables: name resolution against the service snapshot (empty query = all; unknown name => INVALID_ARGUMENT naming the offender), values read via read_sync, converted by the new from_item reverse conversion (single-element numeric arrays => scalars, multi-element => List; Boolean/Binary/text per format; C2-as-integer and U8>2^63 wrap documented as TODOs). Tests run the engine in run_async — the daemon's PRODUCTION threading mode, previously untested — and round-trip through both conversions: SetVariables (declared-format write) then GetVariables (read) over a real in-process channel. Daemon suite 41 -> 61 assertions. daemon_interop.py gains a live GetVariables round-trip check vs the running daemon (verified green). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
External cross-validation harnesses
Each harness in this directory validates the C++ codec, framing, and dispatch against an independent third-party implementation of the same SEMI standards.
See ../docs/VERIFICATION.md for the
internal-vs-external breakdown across all validators.
What's here
| Validator | Independence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|
host_vs_cpp_server.py + passive_equipment.py |
secsgem-py 0.3.0 — Python reference impl | 31 checks: S1, S2, S5, S6, S7, S10 happy paths + unsolicited S6F11 / S5F1 |
raw_gem300_harness.py |
secsgem-py with hand-crafted SecsStreamFunctions | 3 checks: S3F17, S16F5, S16F27 (limited by SFDL grammar) |
secs4j/Secs4jHostHarness.java |
secs4java8 — Apache 2.0 Java impl by kenta-shimizu | 55 checks across S1/S2/S3/S5/S6/S7/S10/S14/S16, including the full E40 body that defeated secsgem-py and unsolicited S6F11/S5F1 observation |
tshark_validate.sh |
Wireshark's built-in HSMS dissector | 69 captured frames dissected with no malformed-packet warnings |
spool_persistence_test.py |
secsgem-py + a docker-restart loop | Restart-survives-spool integrity |
⚙️ ../tests/test_e5_kat.cpp |
SEMI E5 §9 encoding rules | 196 known-answer byte assertions across every format code |
⚙️ ../apps/fuzz_secs2_decode.cpp + fuzz_sml_parse.cpp |
libFuzzer + ASan + UBSan | ~70 000 + ~285 000 random inputs per minute, 0 crashes |
The ⚙️ entries aren't in interop/ directly because they don't
involve a network peer — they're either pure codec round-trips
(KAT) or coverage-guided fuzzing. Listed here so the full external
proof inventory lives in one place.
Running each validator
secsgem-py — secsgem-py active host → C++ server
docker compose up -d server
docker compose run --rm interop python3 /app/interop/host_vs_cpp_server.py \
--host server --port 5000 --session-id 0
secsgem-py — C++ host → secsgem-py equipment
docker compose up -d equipment_py
docker compose run --rm builder /app/build/secs_interop_probe \
--host equipment_py --port 5000 --device 0
secsgem-py — raw GEM 300 frames
docker compose up -d server
docker compose run --rm interop python3 /app/interop/raw_gem300_harness.py \
--host server --port 5000 --session-id 0
secs4j — independent Java host → C++ server
bash interop/secs4j_validate.sh
Builds an eclipse-temurin:21-jdk sidecar with secs4java8 cloned +
compiled at image build, then drives 55 checks against
compose up server. See secs4j/Secs4jHostHarness.java for the
list and secs4j/Dockerfile for the build.
tshark — Wireshark HSMS dissector
docker compose run --rm builder bash /app/interop/tshark_validate.sh
Captures a pcap of the demo flow, runs tshark -V with the HSMS
dissector forced for the test port, asserts no malformed packets +
that all expected control/data frames parse.
spool persistence — restart-survives test
bash interop/spool_persistence_test.py
Drops the host link mid-flight, kills the server, restarts it, and asserts the spooled S5F1 / S6F11 frames drain to the host on reconnect.
When to add a new validator
A new third-party SECS implementation, dissector, or fuzzer target that exercises the wire surface from an angle the existing five don't cover is worth adding. The pattern is consistent:
- New script / harness lives here (or a sidecar Docker context for non-Python validators).
- Wired into
.gitea/workflows/ci.ymlas a separate job. - Listed in this README's table + in
../VERIFICATION.md. - Surfaced in
../docs/PROOFS.mdif it adds a meaningful new dimension.
Bug reports from a new validator → file at raphael@maenle.net
with the wire trace, the validator's output, and the equipment YAML.