Six more chapters finishing Part 2. Together with chapters 10–13 they document every SEMI standard this codebase implements. 14 — E40 + E94: process jobs (8-state lifecycle, S16F11/F5/F7/F9 on the wire) and control jobs (CJ wraps PJs with batch policy, S14F9/S16F27 messages). Worked cascade showing how CJSTART propagates through the PJ FSM and triggers S6F11 CEIDs at each transition. 15 — E87 carriers: three orthogonal sub-machines (CarrierID, SlotMap, CarrierAccess) per carrier and three more (Transfer, Reservation, Association) per load port. S3F17 CarrierAction strings + CAACK codes, S3F19 SlotMap verify, the 5-state slot encoding, multi-port concurrency. 16 — E90 + E157: substrate tracking via three orthogonal axes (STS / SPS / SubstrateIDStatus) and module process tracking (NotExecuting / GeneralExecuting / StepExecuting / StepCompleted). End-to-end PVD example showing E40 + E157 + E90 transitions cascading into CEIDs. 17 — E116 + E120 + E39: equipment performance time-buckets across six states, common equipment model object hierarchy, S14F1/F3 GetAttr/SetAttr as the uniform wire access for any object type across multiple standards. 18 — E84 parallel I/O: ten signal lines, the 9-state handshake FSM, the three TA1/TA2/TA3 timing-critical timers, why a physical handshake gets modeled in software (testability, timer enforcement, CEID emission, multi-port concurrency), the pure-FSM + asio-adapter split. 19 — E42 + E148 + S5F9–F18: formatted recipes (S7F23/F25 typed PPBODY), time synchronization with 16-char + 14-char accepted on set, exception recovery as a persistent multi-step host-supervised FSM (Posted → Recovering → Cleared with abort/retry). Revisits the auto-S9 family and contrasts S9 (transport) vs S5F9 (application). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
7.2 KiB
17 — E116 + E120 + E39: Performance, CEM, objects
← 16 E90 + E157 — Substrate and module tracking | Back to index | Next: 18 E84 — Parallel I/O handoff →
Three smaller GEM 300 standards in one chapter. Each is narrow in scope but load-bearing for production fab operations.
- E116 — Equipment Performance Tracking. Time-buckets per equipment state for OEE / utilisation reporting.
- E120 — Common Equipment Model. A generic typed object hierarchy the host can query.
- E39 — Object Services. CRUD-style messages (
S14F*) that operate over E120 (and other) object types.
E116 — Equipment Performance Tracking
What it does
In a fab, equipment utilisation is a primary KPI. Tools cost $10–100M; idle minutes are visible on quarterly P&L statements. E116 standardises how equipment reports how much time it spent in each state so MES dashboards can compute OEE (Overall Equipment Effectiveness) without per-vendor logic.
The states
// include/secsgem/gem/ept_state.hpp:22
enum class EptState : uint8_t {
NonScheduledTime = 0, // not in the schedule (weekend, planned down)
UnscheduledDowntime = 1, // in schedule, but broken (alarm, fault)
ScheduledDowntime = 2, // in schedule, planned maintenance
Engineering = 3, // running engineering / qualification work
Standby = 4, // ready, awaiting material
Productive = 5, // actively processing
};
These are the SEMI E116 §6.2 standard states. Per-state events:
enum class EptEvent {
Begin_NonScheduledTime,
Begin_UnscheduledDowntime,
Begin_ScheduledDowntime,
Begin_Engineering,
Begin_Standby,
Begin_Productive,
};
What the FSM records
EptStateMachine is a
"what kind of time is this" classifier rather than a strict
lifecycle. Any state can transition to any other. What it
tracks: how long was the equipment in each state.
The store accumulates time-buckets:
class EptStore {
// For each EptState, accumulated wall-clock duration.
std::array<std::chrono::seconds, 6> bucket_;
// Current state + when it was entered (so the dwell so far is
// counted as part of the current bucket on read).
};
A host querying "how much Productive time today?" gets the bucket
value for Productive, plus the dwell of the current state if
that state is Productive.
Wire
E116 doesn't define its own S/F messages. Like E90, state changes fire as CEIDs the host has subscribed to.
Tests:
tests/test_ept.cpp (7 cases — initial
state, transitions, bucket accumulation including current dwell,
reset, same-state no-op).
When EPT transitions happen
EPT classification is application logic. The library doesn't
decide that processing a PJ = Productive — the EAP does, by
explicitly calling EptStateMachine::on_event(Begin_Productive)
when a PJ starts. Typical wiring:
PJ Processing → EPT Productive
PJ Paused → EPT Standby (or Engineering, depending on cause)
Alarm category 2 (equipment safety) → EPT UnscheduledDowntime
Maintenance recipe running → EPT ScheduledDowntime
The examples/pvd_tool/main.cpp §5
shows one concrete wiring; chapter
41 discusses the
production patterns.
E120 — Common Equipment Model
What it does
E120 defines a generic typed object hierarchy the equipment can expose to the host. The motivation: every E30/GEM 300 standard defines its own object type (Carrier, Substrate, ProcessJob, ControlJob, Alarm, …), each with its own attributes. E120 says "all of these are objects with the same hierarchical structure; let's standardise how the host queries them."
The object types
// include/secsgem/gem/store/cem_objects.hpp:27
enum class CemObjectType : uint8_t {
Equipment = 1,
IOProcessor = 2,
IODevice = 3,
SubsystemController = 4,
Subsystem = 5,
Module = 6,
// ... more
};
Each object has:
- A unique
OBJID(ASCII string). - A type from the enum above.
- A
parent_objid(or empty for root — Equipment). - A typed attribute bag.
That builds the hierarchy:
Equipment "PVD-1"
├── IOProcessor "IOP-1"
│ ├── IODevice "Sensor-Pressure-A"
│ └── IODevice "Sensor-Temp-A"
└── SubsystemController "SubC-1"
├── Subsystem "Vacuum"
│ └── Module "Pump-1"
└── Subsystem "Gas-Manifold"
The host can walk this tree, read attributes, and update its own asset model.
Code
Store:
include/secsgem/gem/store/cem_objects.hpp.
Tests:
tests/test_cem_objects.cpp (3
cases — create, lookup, child enumeration).
Wire
E120 itself doesn't define messages — it defines the data model. The wire access is E39 Object Services.
E39 — Object Services
What it does
E39 generalises "get attribute of an object" and "set attribute of
an object" into one message family — S14F* — that works across
any object type (E120 hierarchy, E40 process jobs, E94 control
jobs, E87 carriers, …).
The messages
| S/F | Direction | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| S14F1 | H → E | GetAttr. Body: object type + OBJID + attribute name list. |
| S14F2 | E → H | GetAttr reply. Body: attribute values + OBJACK byte. |
| S14F3 | H → E | SetAttr. Body: object type + OBJID + name/value pairs. |
| S14F4 | E → H | SetAttr reply. |
OBJACK = 0 means accepted; non-zero means error.
E39 is the uniform API for object introspection — same shape of message whether the host is reading a Carrier attribute, an Alarm attribute, or a Process Module attribute.
Code
Handlers live in
include/secsgem/gem/host_command_registry.hpp
and the generated message catalog.
Tests are bundled into
tests/test_cem_objects.cpp and
tests/test_messages.cpp — the
S14F1/S14F2 round-trip is exercised against multiple object
types.
Why E39 exists separately from E120
The split is the SEMI typical-shape: one standard defines the data model, a separate standard defines the wire access. This way E39 can extend to objects defined in other standards (E40 PJs, E94 CJs, E87 carriers) without E120 having to know about them.
In code, each object store registers itself with a generic
attribute-resolver; S14F1 handlers look up the right resolver by
object type.
Where to go next
You now know how the equipment reports time (E116), structure (E120), and attribute access (E39). The next chapter is the last GEM 300 standard with its own state machine — the parallel I/O handshake that physically hands carriers between robot and load port.