Files
secs-gem/examples/pvd_tool/README.md
T
raphael 6aa4427186
tests / build-and-test (push) Successful in 2m7s
tests / thread-sanitizer (push) Successful in 2m33s
tests / tshark-dissector (push) Failing after 2m10s
tests / secs4j-interop (push) Failing after 1s
tests / libfuzzer (push) Successful in 3m11s
docs: worked PVD-tool vendor example
A fictional Physical Vapor Deposition tool wired end-to-end.
examples/pvd_tool/ is the template a real customer should fork.

Files:
- equipment.yaml: 32 SVIDs (chamber pressure, temperature, source
  power, gas flows, cooling water, wafer counters, recipe step
  state, EPT name, 4 load ports), 5 DVIDs, 7 ECIDs (setpoints
  + T_CRA/T_DELAY + cleaning interval + retry count), 17 CEIDs
  (control state, alarms, process lifecycle, material movement,
  EPT), 12 alarms with realistic categories (safety, error,
  warning, attention), 3 multi-step recipes (Al / Ti / Cu),
  9 host commands.

- main.cpp (~860 lines): the vendor-side application:
  §1 helpers + constants
  §2 sensor simulator — 4 sensors at 10 Hz + 1 Hz cadences,
     random-walk around step-targeted setpoints, asio::post-on-strand
     thread-safety pattern
  §3 recipe runner — parses recipe body (STEP NAME duration=120s
     power=2500W gas=Argon flow=50sccm), walks each step at 1s
     per declared-second, fires step-started/completed CEIDs,
     drives PJ FSM through ProcessComplete
  §4 alarm threshold monitor — chamber-pressure-over-setpoint and
     cleaning-interval logic, continuous evaluation, set/clear
     emission gated on alarm-enable
  §5 EPT cycler — Standby ↔ Productive ↔ UnscheduledDowntime
     based on PJ activity + safety alarms
  §6 Prometheus exporter on :9090 (pvd_messages_total,
     pvd_chamber_pressure_torr, pvd_spool_depth, pvd_events_total,
     pvd_alarm_set_total)
  §7 Router handlers — full E30 set (~40 handlers) so a host can
     do real work
  §8 main() — YAML validation, model construction, server wiring,
     periodic gauge updates

- README.md: section-by-section walkthrough, what's the same as
  apps/secs_server.cpp, what this adds (simulator + recipe runner
  + alarm monitor + EPT cycler + metrics), what's not here
  (persistence + E84 + real I/O), and what to change for your tool.

Verification: 47/47 conformance harness checks PASS against the
PVD tool — same as the demo server.

CMakeLists.txt adds the pvd_tool target.

README's documentation map points at examples/pvd_tool/.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-09 16:57:10 +02:00

7.0 KiB

ACME-PVD-3000 — worked vendor example

A fictional Physical Vapor Deposition tool, end-to-end. This is what a real tool integrator's deployment looks like:

  • equipment.yaml — the tool's data dictionary (32 SVIDs, 5 DVIDs, 7 ECIDs, 17 CEIDs, 12 alarms, 3 recipes, 9 host commands)
  • main.cpp — the vendor application: sensor simulator, recipe runner, alarm threshold monitor, EPT cycling, metrics exporter, Router handlers wiring it all to the wire.

If you're starting a real integration, fork these two files and customize. They're written to be a template, not an abstract demo.

What it demonstrates

Section in main.cpp What it shows you how to do
§1 Helpers + constants The few kSvidX / kCeidX constants worth pinning at file scope
§2 Sensor simulator Multi-cadence sensor poll loops (10 Hz pressure, 1 Hz temps), with the asio::post-onto-strand thread-safety pattern
§3 Recipe runner Driving a PJ through SettingUp → Processing → ProcessComplete by walking the recipe body, with per-step CEID emission
§4 Alarm threshold monitor Continuous threshold-based alarm logic (chamber pressure, cleaning interval) with set/clear emission
§5 EPT cycling E116 state transitions driven by PJ state + safety alarms
§6 Metrics Prometheus exporter on :9090 with per-CEID counters and gauge updates
§7 Router handlers Every SECS/GEM message a host might send to a PVD tool, ~40 handlers in ~200 lines
§8 main() Loading YAML → validating → composing → running

Running it

From repo root:

# Validate the configs (this is what your CI should do).
docker compose run --rm builder /app/build/secs_server --validate-config \
    --config /app/examples/pvd_tool/equipment.yaml \
    --state-table /app/data/control_state.yaml \
    --pj-state-table /app/data/process_job_state.yaml \
    --cj-state-table /app/data/control_job_state.yaml

# Start the tool.
docker compose run --rm builder /app/build/pvd_tool \
    /app/examples/pvd_tool/equipment.yaml \
    /app/data/control_state.yaml \
    5000 \
    9090

# In another shell, drive it with the conformance harness or a real host.
docker compose run --rm builder /app/build/secs_conformance \
    --host 127.0.0.1 --port 5000 --device 0
# 47 / 47 checks passed

Or via Docker Compose if you'd rather wire it as a service.

What the host sees

Once a host connects and SELECTs:

  1. S1F1 → S1F2 returns MDLN="ACME-PVD-3000", SOFTREV="1.4.2".
  2. S1F3 on the 32 SVIDs returns live sensor readings — chamber pressure tracks the simulator's target (default 1e-7 Torr in idle), wafer counter increments per processed PJ, EPT state gauge says Standby.
  3. S2F33/F35/F37 binds dynamic event reports; CEIDs 300 / 301 / 310 / 311 fire on real PJ activity.
  4. S2F41 RCMD=START kicks the recipe runner: any PJ in WaitingForStart transitions to Processing and the simulator starts tracking the recipe's step targets. Sensor values change in real time. CEID 300 (ProcessStarted) emits, then per-step CEID 310/311, then CEID 301 (ProcessCompleted) on completion.
  5. S2F41 RCMD=FAULT sets alarm 4 → S5F1 emitted (if enabled via S5F3 first).
  6. S7F19 lists the 3 recipes; S7F5 returns the body (multi-line STEP definitions).
  7. S16F11 (PJ create) + S14F9 (CJ create) + S16F27 (CJSTART) drives the full E40/E94 lifecycle.

What's the same as the secs-gem demo server

apps/secs_server.cpp (used by docker compose up server) is the canonical fully-loaded server. This example is structurally a slimmer fork:

  • Same Router pattern (gem::Router + router.on(s, f, [...]))
  • Same event/alarm emission helpers (deliver_or_spool, emit_event, emit_alarm_set)
  • Same control-state-change handler wiring

What this example adds that the demo doesn't:

  • Sensor simulator with multi-cadence poll loops. The demo's SVID values stay at their YAML defaults; PVD's drift toward recipe-step targets.
  • Recipe runner that parses the recipe body and drives the PJ FSM step-by-step. The demo's RCMD=START just emits the linked CEID; PVD actually walks the recipe.
  • Alarm threshold monitor — continuous evaluation of sensor values against ECID setpoints. The demo only fires alarms when RCMD=FAULT is sent.
  • EPT cycling — automatic Standby↔Productive↔UnscheduledDowntime based on PJ + alarm state. The demo doesn't cycle EPT.
  • Prometheus metrics exporter on a second port. The demo logs but doesn't export.

If you want one of these patterns in your own tool, lift the code from main.cpp directly — each section is independently usable.

What's not here

  • Persistence. The demo server's --spool-dir flag is the pattern to copy. Add model->spool.enable_persistence(...) etc. at startup before binding the port. See INTEGRATION.md §5.
  • E84 handshake timers. No load-port AMHS wiring; see INTEGRATION.md §4.6 for the E84AsioTimers adapter.
  • Real I/O bridges. Sensor values come from a random-walk simulator. A real PVD tool would have a PLC/serial driver module-bridge feeding model->svids.set_value(...) from real hardware.
  • Production deployment hardening — SECURITY.md (nftables, stunnel, minisign signing) and INTEGRATION.md §7 (HA pattern).

What you'd change for your tool

  1. Replace equipment.yaml with your tool's actual SVIDs, ECIDs, alarms, recipes. Run secs_server --validate-config after every edit.
  2. Replace the sensor simulator (pvd::Simulator) with calls into your real hardware driver. Keep the asio::post pattern for cross-thread updates.
  3. Replace the recipe runner with your real recipe engine integration. The shape — fire Start, walk steps, fire ProcessComplete — is the contract; the implementation is yours.
  4. Replace the alarm threshold monitor with your real alarm sources (sensor interrupts, watchdog timers, hardware fault lines). Same emit_alarm_set / emit_alarm_clear API.
  5. Keep most of the Router handler section — those are spec- defined and you'll need them all in production.

That's it. No framework, no DI container, no abstract base classes. ~700 lines of vendor code on top of the library.

Cross-references