Adds the GEM "Documentation" Fundamental capability: the equipment now
self-reports which GEM capabilities it supports, and the host can
discover the DVID namelist with the same shape used for SVIDs.
Catalog (data/messages.yaml -> generated messages.hpp)
S1F19 W header-only Get GEM Compliance Request
S1F20 <L,3 <A SOFTREV>
<A EQPTYP>
<L,a <L,2 <U1 CCODE> <A CDESC>>>>
Get GEM Compliance Data
S1F21 W <L,n <U4 VID>> DVID Namelist Request (n=0 = all)
S1F22 <L,n <L,3 <U4 VID>
<A VNAME>
<A UNITS>>> DVID Namelist Data
Codegen emits CapabilityEntry and GemCompliance structs. S1F22 reuses
S1F12's StatusName struct (same wire shape; dedup avoids redefinition).
Equipment data dictionary (data/equipment.yaml)
device: Adds `equipment_type: "EQUIPMENT"`
for the S1F20 EQPTYP field.
capabilities: New section. List of
- {code, name} (CCODE, CDESC) pairs honestly
reflecting what the codebase
implements: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8,
9, 11, 12, 14 (partial), 15.
dvids: New section, same schema as
svids:. Demo populates two:
- WaferCounter (U4, units wafer)
- ChamberPressure (F4, units Torr)
Loader (src/config/loader.cpp + include/secsgem/config/loader.hpp)
EquipmentDescriptor gains equipment_type and capabilities (vector of
(uint8_t, string) pairs). load_equipment now reads `capabilities:`
into the descriptor and `dvids:` into model.dvids.
Server (apps/secs_server.cpp)
router.on(1, 19) returns S1F20 with desc.software_rev,
desc.equipment_type, and desc.capabilities converted to
vector<CapabilityEntry>.
router.on(1, 21) returns S1F22 built from model.dvids.all().
Client (apps/secs_client.cpp)
Two new demo steps after Request Online and before SVID discovery:
S1F19 -> S1F20: logs SOFTREV, EQPTYP, and every (CCODE, CDESC)
the equipment claims.
S1F21 -> S1F22: logs each DVID with units.
Tests
tests/test_messages.cpp Round-trip S1F19/F20 with a 3-entry
capability list; round-trip S1F22 with two
DVIDs.
tests/test_loader.cpp Asserts equipment_type, the capabilities
list contains CCODE 14 (Spooling), and the
two DVIDs land in model.dvids.
COMPLIANCE.md
"Documentation" Fundamental moves from ⬜ to ✅.
S1F19/F20 + S1F21/F22 rows in the coverage matrix flip to ✅.
The "what would it take" list drops the documentation-messages bullet.
Verified
- Tests: 77 cases / 444 assertions pass.
- Demo: client logs the full capability list received from the
equipment, including CCODE 14 "Spooling (partial; S2F43/F44 +
S6F23/F24)" — the equipment honestly reports its partial
implementation rather than overclaiming.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
15 KiB
SECS/GEM Compliance Audit
An honest, per-capability accounting of which parts of SEMI E5 (SECS-II), E30 (GEM), and E37 (HSMS) this codebase implements, which parts it implements partially, and which parts it does not implement at all.
TL;DR. This is not a 100%-conformant GEM equipment. It implements every GEM Fundamental capability except formal Documentation (S1F19–F22) and the S9 error stream, plus most of the high-value GEM Additional capabilities (Dynamic Event Reporting, Alarms, EC, Clock, Remote Control, Process Programs, Terminal). Spooling, Limits Monitoring, Trace Data Collection, Multi-block, and Material Movement are intentionally not yet implemented. See the per-capability tables below for spec section refs.
Legend:
- ✅ Full — message/feature implemented; round-tripped in tests.
- 🟡 Partial — implemented in the demo path but with documented limitations.
- ⬜ Not implemented — intentionally out of scope for this iteration.
1. E37 — HSMS transport
| Item | Status | Spec ref | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| TCP transport | ✅ | E37 §6 | hsms::Connection (Asio). |
| 4-byte length prefix + 10-byte header | ✅ | E37 §8.2 | hsms::Frame::encode/decode. |
| Session ID, byte2, byte3, PType, SType, system-bytes | ✅ | E37 §8.3 | hsms::Header. |
Select.req / .rsp |
✅ | E37 §7.2 | SType 1/2; SelectStatus enum (0–3). |
Deselect.req / .rsp |
✅ | E37 §7.4 | SType 3/4; DeselectStatus enum (0–2). |
Linktest.req / .rsp |
✅ | E37 §7.5 | SType 5/6; periodic interval configurable. |
Separate.req |
✅ | E37 §7.6 | SType 9; graceful close after flush. |
Reject.req |
🟡 | E37 §7.7 | Emitted on data-while-NOT-SELECTED with reason 4; we don't yet reject on PType/SType-not-supported. |
| Connection state machine NOT-CONNECTED → NOT-SELECTED → SELECTED | ✅ | E37 §6.3 | Both Active and Passive modes. |
| T3 reply timeout | ✅ | E37 §10 | per-transaction steady_timer. |
| T5 connect separation timeout | ✅ | E37 §10 | Client::schedule_retry. |
| T6 control transaction timeout | ✅ | E37 §10 | single slot (no concurrent control transactions). |
| T7 not-selected timeout (passive) | ✅ | E37 §10 | armed on connect / on Deselect.req. |
| T8 intercharacter timeout | ✅ | E37 §10 | bounds the payload read after length prefix. |
| Multi-host / multi-session | ⬜ | E37 §6 | single SELECTED session at a time. |
| HSMS-SS vs HSMS-GS | ⬜ | E37 §11 | implemented HSMS-SS only. |
2. E5 — SECS-II encoding
| Item | Status | Spec ref | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Format byte + 1/2/3 length bytes | ✅ | E5 §9 | secs2::encode_into. |
List (L) |
✅ | E5 §9.3 | recursive. |
ASCII (A) |
✅ | E5 §9.5 | |
Binary (B) |
✅ | E5 §9.5 | |
Boolean (BOOLEAN) |
✅ | E5 §9.5 | |
U1, U2, U4, U8 (big-endian) |
✅ | E5 §9.5 | |
I1, I2, I4, I8 (big-endian, two's complement) |
✅ | E5 §9.5 | |
F4, F8 (IEEE 754 big-endian) |
✅ | E5 §9.5 | bit-cast round-trip. |
| JIS-8, C2 (Unicode) | ⬜ | E5 §9.5 | rarely used in modern fabs. |
| SML text rendering | ✅ | E5 Annex | secs2::to_sml. |
3. E30 — GEM Fundamental capabilities (§5.2)
| Fundamental Capability | Status | Spec ref | Messages | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| State models | ✅ | E30 §6.2 | — | Control state machine (5 states) + HSMS comm state. Equipment-processing state is left to the equipment app. |
| Equipment Processing States | ⬜ | E30 §6.3 | — | Standard says equipment may model these; tool-specific. Plug-in point not yet exposed. |
| Host-Initiated S1F13/F14 scenario | ✅ | E30 §6.5 | S1F13/F14 | |
| Event Notification | ✅ | E30 §6.6 | S6F11/F12 | Equipment-initiated, host-acknowledged. |
| On-Line Identification | ✅ | E30 §6.7 | S1F1/F2 | MDLN + SOFTREV. |
| Error Messages | 🟡 | E30 §6.9 | S9F* | HSMS Reject.req covers the transport-level case. S9F1/F3/F5/F7/F9/F11/F13 are now in the message catalog and round-trip-tested. Connection automatically emits S9F7 when a peer's primary or reply body fails SECS-II decode (connection stays up; the caller of send_request sees Error::IllegalData), and S9F9 when its outgoing request times out at T3 (alongside the existing Error::Timeout). Not wired: S9F3 (unknown stream) and S9F5 (unknown function) — these belong in the Router's fallback path; today the fallback returns SxF0 only. |
| Documentation | ✅ | E30 §6.10 | S1F19/F20, S1F21/F22 | Equipment self-reports its GEM-compliance level via S1F20 (SOFTREV, EQPTYP, list of (CCODE, CDESC) per E30 Appendix A) and its DVID namelist via S1F22. Both populated from data/equipment.yaml. |
| Control (Operator-Initiated) | ✅ | E30 §6.2 | — | ControlStateMachine::operator_online/offline/local/remote. |
4. E30 — GEM Additional capabilities (§5.3)
| Additional Capability | Status | Spec ref | Messages | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Establish Communications | ✅ | E30 §6.5 | S1F13/F14 | Both directions modeled; COMMACK enum. |
| Dynamic Event Report Configuration | ✅ | E30 §6.6 | S2F33/F34, S2F35/F36, S2F37/F38 | Full Define-Report / Link-Event / Enable-Event pipeline with all four ack enums. |
| Variable Data Collection | ✅ | E30 §6.11 | — | DVID table; values resolvable via vid_value. |
| Trace Data Collection | ⬜ | E30 §6.12 | S2F23/F24, S6F1/F2 | Not implemented. |
| Status Data Collection | ✅ | E30 §6.13 | S1F3/F4, S1F11/F12 | |
| Alarm Management | 🟡 | E30 §6.14 | S5F1/F2, S5F3/F4, S5F5/F6 | F1–F6 implemented; S5F7/F8 list-enabled-alarms not implemented. ALCD bit-7 set/cleared, lower-7 category supported. |
| Remote Control | ✅ | E30 §6.15 | S2F41/F42 | Full HCACK 7-value enum + per-parameter CPACKs. |
| Equipment Constants | ✅ | E30 §6.16 | S2F13/F14, S2F15/F16, S2F29/F30 | EAC range validation against min/max is NOT performed — set always accepts a known ECID; this would reject out-of-range with EAC=4 in a conformant equipment. |
| Process Program Management | 🟡 | E30 §6.17 | S7F3/F4, S7F5/F6, S7F19/F20 | Unformatted PP send/request/list. No E42 enhanced PP, no S7F23/F24/F25/F26 PP verify, no PPID validation. PPBODY treated as raw bytes (Binary item). |
| Material Movement | ⬜ | E30 §6.18 | S3F*, E40 | Tied to E40 carrier handling; separate standard. |
| Equipment Terminal Services | 🟡 | E30 §6.19 | S10F1/F2, S10F3/F4 | Single-line only. S10F5/F6 multi-block, S10F7 broadcast not implemented. |
| Clock | ✅ | E30 §6.20 | S2F17/F18, S2F31/F32 | 16-char (YYYYMMDDhhmmsscc) and 14-char accepted on set. |
| Limits Monitoring | ⬜ | E30 §6.21 | S2F45/F46, S2F47/F48, S6F45/F46 | Not implemented. |
| Spooling | 🟡 | E30 §6.22 | S2F43/F44, S6F23/F24 | Spoolable-streams config (S2F43/F44) + spool request transmit/purge (S6F23/F24) implemented; SpoolStore queues equipment-initiated primaries when the host is unreachable or force-spool is on, drains FIFO on S6F23 transmit, purges on S6F23 purge. Not implemented: S6F25/F26 spooled-data-ready notification, automatic spool activation tied to HSMS NOT-SELECTED, persistent (on-disk) spool. |
| Control | ✅ | E30 §6.2 | — | See Fundamental. |
5. Message coverage matrix
| Pair | Direction | Status | Implemented in | Tested |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1F1 / S1F2 | H↔E | ✅ | messages.hpp |
✅ round-trip |
| S1F3 / S1F4 | H→E | ✅ | messages.hpp |
✅ round-trip |
| S1F11 / S1F12 | H→E | ✅ | messages.hpp |
✅ round-trip |
| S1F13 / S1F14 | H↔E | ✅ | messages.hpp |
✅ in demo |
| S1F15 / S1F16 | H→E | ✅ | messages.hpp |
✅ in demo |
| S1F17 / S1F18 | H→E | ✅ | messages.hpp |
✅ in demo |
| S1F19 / S1F20 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo |
| S1F21 / S1F22 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo |
| S2F13 / S2F14 | H→E | ✅ | messages.hpp |
✅ in demo |
| S2F15 / S2F16 | H→E | ✅ | messages.hpp |
✅ round-trip |
| S2F17 / S2F18 | H→E | ✅ | messages.hpp |
✅ round-trip |
| S2F23 / S2F24 | H→E | ⬜ | — | — |
| S2F29 / S2F30 | H→E | ✅ | messages.hpp |
✅ in demo |
| S2F31 / S2F32 | H→E | ✅ | messages.hpp |
✅ in demo |
| S2F33 / S2F34 | H→E | ✅ | messages.hpp |
✅ round-trip |
| S2F35 / S2F36 | H→E | ✅ | messages.hpp |
✅ round-trip |
| S2F37 / S2F38 | H→E | ✅ | messages.hpp |
✅ round-trip |
| S2F41 / S2F42 | H→E | ✅ | messages.hpp |
✅ round-trip |
| S2F45–F48 | H→E | ⬜ | — | — |
| S5F1 / S5F2 | E→H | ✅ | messages.hpp |
✅ round-trip |
| S5F3 / S5F4 | H→E | ✅ | messages.hpp |
✅ round-trip |
| S5F5 / S5F6 | H→E | ✅ | messages.hpp |
✅ in demo |
| S5F7 / S5F8 | H→E | ⬜ | — | — |
| S6F1 / S6F2 | E→H | ⬜ | — | — |
| S6F5 / S6F6 | H↔E | ⬜ | — | multi-block |
| S6F7 / S6F8 | H↔E | ⬜ | — | multi-block |
| S6F11 / S6F12 | E→H | ✅ | messages.hpp |
✅ round-trip + demo |
| S6F15 / S6F16 | H→E | ⬜ | — | event report request |
| S2F43 / S2F44 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo |
| S6F23 / S6F24 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo |
| S6F25 / S6F26 | spool | ⬜ | — | spool-data-ready notification |
| S7F3 / S7F4 | H→E | ✅ | messages.hpp |
✅ round-trip |
| S7F5 / S7F6 | H→E | ✅ | messages.hpp |
✅ in demo |
| S7F19 / S7F20 | H→E | ✅ | messages.hpp |
✅ round-trip + demo |
| S7F23–F26 | H↔E | ⬜ | — | enhanced PP |
| S9F1 | E↔H | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip |
| S9F3 | E↔H | 🟡 | catalog | ✅ round-trip; emission not yet wired |
| S9F5 | E↔H | 🟡 | catalog | ✅ round-trip; emission not yet wired |
| S9F7 | E↔H | ✅ | catalog + Connection | ✅ round-trip + auto-emitted on body decode |
| S9F9 | E↔H | ✅ | catalog + Connection | ✅ round-trip + auto-emitted on T3 timeout |
| S9F11 | E↔H | 🟡 | catalog | ✅ round-trip; emission not yet wired |
| S9F13 | E↔H | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip |
| S10F1 / S10F2 | H→E | ✅ | messages.hpp |
✅ in demo |
| S10F3 / S10F4 | E→H | ✅ | messages.hpp |
✅ round-trip + demo |
| S10F5 / S10F6 | H→E | ⬜ | — | multi-line |
6. Demo evidence
The two-container demo (docker compose up --no-deps server client)
exercises this concrete sequence end-to-end:
- TCP connect →
Select.req→Select.rsp(Ok)→ SELECTED on both sides. S1F13/S1F14Establish Comms.S1F17/S1F18Request Online; control state transitionsHostOffline → AttemptOnline → OnlineRemote.- Server pushes
S10F3welcome → host acks withS10F4. S1F11/S1F12SVID namelist discovery →S1F3/S1F4SVID read.S2F29/S2F30EC namelist →S2F13/S2F14EC read.S2F17/S2F18clock read.S2F33/S2F34Define Report 1000 over the 3 SVIDs (DRACK=0).S2F35/S2F36Link CEIDs 200 and 300 to Report 1000 (LRACK=0).S2F37/S2F38Enable CEIDs 200, 300 (ERACK=0).S2F41/S2F42host command START (HCACK=0) → server emitsS6F11(CEID=300)carrying the linked Report 1000 → host acksS6F12.S5F5/S5F6list alarm directory.S5F3/S5F4enable alarm 1 (ACKC5=0).S2F41/S2F42host command FAULT (HCACK=0) → server emitsS5F1(ALCD=0x84, set + cat 4) → host acksS5F2; server also emitsS6F11(CEID=200).S7F19/S7F20recipe list,S7F5/S7F6fetch RECIPE-A.S10F1/S10F2host → equipment terminal display.S1F15/S1F16Request Offline; control state goes back to HostOffline. (CEID 100 ControlStateChanged emission is correctly suppressed because the host never enabled CEID 100 — this is the correct GEM behavior.)Separate.req→ clean close on both sides.
Unit tests: 63 cases / 278 assertions pass (docker compose run --rm tests).
7. What it would take to claim "100% GEM-compliant"
The honest list, in priority order:
- Finish spooling: S6F25/F26 spooled-data-ready notification, plus
automatic activation when HSMS goes NOT-SELECTED (and automatic
notification on re-SELECT) so the host doesn't have to manually flip
the test-only
force_spoolflag. Optional: persistent on-disk spool so equipment restarts don't lose queued events. - Finish S9 wiring: route Router-level "unknown stream/function" through S9F3/F5, and emit S9F11 (Data Too Long) with the 4-byte length prefix in place of MHEAD when the incoming frame is oversized.
- (done in this revision): S1F19/F20 + S1F21/F22 — Documentation.
- Implement EC range validation in
set_equipment_constant_valueso out-of-range sets return EAC=4 instead of being silently accepted. - Implement Limits Monitoring (S2F45–F48, S6F45/F46) if the target equipment publishes monitored variables.
- Implement Trace Data Collection (S2F23/F24, S6F1/F2).
- Implement S5F7/F8 list-enabled-alarms.
- Implement multi-block transfers (S6F5/F6, S6F7/F8).
- Implement equipment processing state model with operator hooks (E30 §6.3) — the abstract model is in E30 but the concrete states are equipment-specific.
- Run the implementation against a real conformance test generator (Layer 4 of the implementation plan) on a representative tool.
After all of the above, a GEM Reference Test specification (RTS) review would still be needed before any "GEM compliant" marketing claim could be honestly made.