raphael/secs-gem
Public Access
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Files
90c177b7cea1e4e5c38705839b3c61670ffee14b
secs-gem/COMPLIANCE.md
T
raphael 90c177b7ce E40 Process Jobs + E94 Control Jobs + E30 communication state 
GEM300 layer: SEMI E40-0705 Process Job and E94-0705 Control Job
state machines, plus the E30 §6.1 communication-state machine that
sits between HSMS SELECT and full GEM communication. Data-driven
via data/process_job_state.yaml and data/control_job_state.yaml,
mirroring the existing control_state.yaml pattern.

Wire coverage:
  S14F9/F10   CreateObject (CJ)              host -> equipment
  S14F11/F12  DeleteObject (CJ)              host -> equipment
  S16F5/F6    PRJobCommand                   host -> equipment
  S16F9       PRJobAlert                     equipment -> host
  S16F11/F12  PRJobCreate (simplified body)  host -> equipment
  S16F13/F14  PRJobDequeue                   host -> equipment
  S16F27/F28  CJobCommand                    host -> equipment

Process Job FSM exposes 8 states matching PRJOBSTATE bytes (E40 §10.3.2);
HOQ is reorder-aware (move-to-head against an insertion-order vector);
Stop/Abort on a Queued PJ routes through ABORTING so the host observes
PRJOBSTATE=7 on the wire (§6.3); alert_enabled is settable per-PJ for
PRALERT control; FSM dispatches through ProcessJobStore::on_change_
dynamically so a late set_state_change_handler() reaches existing PJs.

Hardening: loader rejects NoState (sentinel) as initial/from/to and
rejects `on: created` rows; static_asserts pin enum values to wire
bytes; ProcessJobStore is non-movable to keep the per-PJ this-capture
safe.

Server simulator cascades the full CJ -> PJ lifecycle on CJSTART so
the wire trace exercises every legal state. CEIDs 400/401 fire on CJ
state changes via the existing event-report pipeline.

Tests: 60+ new assertions across test_process_jobs, test_control_jobs,
test_communication_state, test_hsms_connection, plus loader and
messages round-trip coverage.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-07 21:00:32 +02:00

297 lines
22 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# SECS/GEM Compliance
A per-capability accounting against SEMI **E5 (SECS-II)**, **E30 (GEM)**,
**E37 (HSMS)**, and **GEM300 E40 / E94** (process / control jobs).
> **Status.** Every GEM Fundamental capability and every GEM Additional
> capability that E30 ties to a concrete SECS-II message set is
> implemented. See §7 for the explicit out-of-scope items (which are
> deliberate, not omissions) and §8 for what "100% GEM-compliant" can
> and cannot honestly mean about this codebase.
Legend:
- ✅ **Full** — implemented to the spec; round-trip-tested.
- 🟡 **Partial** — implemented in the demo path with a documented limitation.
- ⬜ **Out of scope** — deliberately not implemented; reason given.
---
## 1. E37 — HSMS transport
| Item | Status | Spec ref | Notes |
|---------------------------------------|--------|----------|-------|
| TCP transport | ✅ | E37 §6 | `hsms::Connection` over standalone Asio. |
| 4-byte length prefix + 10-byte header | ✅ | E37 §8.2 | `hsms::Frame::encode/decode`. |
| Session ID, byte2, byte3, PType, SType, system-bytes | ✅ | E37 §8.3 | `hsms::Header`. |
| `Select.req / .rsp` | ✅ | E37 §7.2 | `SType` 1/2; SelectStatus enum (0–3). |
| `Deselect.req / .rsp` | ✅ | E37 §7.4 | `SType` 3/4; DeselectStatus enum (0–2). |
| `Linktest.req / .rsp` | ✅ | E37 §7.5 | `SType` 5/6; periodic interval configurable. |
| `Separate.req` | ✅ | E37 §7.6 | `SType` 9; graceful close after flush. |
| `Reject.req` | ✅ | E37 §7.7 | Emitted on data-while-NOT-SELECTED. |
| Connection state machine NOT-CONNECTED → NOT-SELECTED → SELECTED | ✅ | E37 §6.3 | Both Active and Passive modes. |
| T3 reply timeout | ✅ | E37 §10 | Per-transaction `steady_timer`. |
| T5 connect separation timeout | ✅ | E37 §10 | `Client::schedule_retry`. |
| T6 control transaction timeout | ✅ | E37 §10 | One concurrent control transaction. |
| T7 not-selected timeout (passive) | ✅ | E37 §10 | Armed on connect / on Deselect.req. |
| T8 intercharacter timeout | ✅ | E37 §10 | Bounds the payload read after length prefix. |
| HSMS-SS (single-session) | ✅ | E37 §11 | The codebase is HSMS-SS only by design. |
| HSMS-GS (general-session) | ⬜ | E37 §11 | Multi-session; out of scope for this revision. |
---
## 2. E5 — SECS-II encoding
| Item | Status | Spec ref | Notes |
|---------------------------------------|--------|----------|-------|
| Format byte + 1/2/3 length bytes | ✅ | E5 §9 | `secs2::encode_into`. |
| List (`L`) | ✅ | E5 §9.3 | Recursive. |
| ASCII (`A`) | ✅ | E5 §9.5 | |
| Binary (`B`) | ✅ | E5 §9.5 | |
| Boolean (`BOOLEAN`) | ✅ | E5 §9.5 | |
| `U1, U2, U4, U8` (big-endian) | ✅ | E5 §9.5 | |
| `I1, I2, I4, I8` (big-endian, two's complement) | ✅ | E5 §9.5 | |
| `F4, F8` (IEEE 754 big-endian) | ✅ | E5 §9.5 | bit-cast round-trip. |
| JIS-8 (single-byte JIS text) | ✅ | E5 §9.5 | `Format::JIS8` (0x11); shares `std::string` storage with ASCII, disambiguated by `Format`. |
| C2 (Unicode 2-byte code points) | ✅ | E5 §9.5 | `Format::C2` (0x12); big-endian uint16_t code points. |
| SML text rendering | ✅ | E5 Annex | `secs2::to_sml`. JIS-8 prints as `<J "...">`, C2 as `<C 65 66 ...>`. |
---
## 3. E30 — GEM Fundamental capabilities (§5.2)
| Fundamental Capability | Status | Spec ref | Messages | Notes |
|---------------------------------------|--------|----------|----------|-------|
| State models | ✅ | E30 §6.2 | — | E30 control state machine (5 states) + HSMS communication state machine. |
| Equipment Processing States | ✅ | E30 §6.3 | — | The `ControlTransitionTable` engine is general; vendors load their tool-specific states (IDLE/SETUP/READY/EXECUTING/PAUSE/...) via a second YAML file using the same loader. The spec leaves the concrete states tool-specific. |
| Host-Initiated S1F13/F14 scenario | ✅ | E30 §6.5 | S1F13/F14 | |
| Event Notification | ✅ | E30 §6.6 | S6F11/F12 | Equipment-initiated, host-acknowledged. |
| On-Line Identification | ✅ | E30 §6.7 | S1F1/F2 | MDLN + SOFTREV. |
| Error Messages | ✅ | E30 §6.9 | S9F* | Auto-emission of S9F3/F5/F7/F9/F11 on the documented protocol-error conditions; S9F1/F13 in the catalog for explicit emission. |
| Documentation | ✅ | E30 §6.10| S1F19/F20, S1F21/F22 | Equipment self-reports its compliance + DVID namelist. |
| Control (Operator-Initiated) | ✅ | E30 §6.2 | — | `ControlStateMachine::operator_online/offline/local/remote`. |
---
## 4. E30 — GEM Additional capabilities (§5.3)
| Additional Capability | Status | Spec ref | Messages | Notes |
|---------------------------------------|--------|----------|----------|-------|
| Establish Communications | ✅ | E30 §6.5 | S1F13/F14 | Both directions modeled; COMMACK enum. Backed by the E30 §6.5 Communication state machine (`gem::CommunicationStateMachine`) with DISABLED / WAIT-CRA / WAIT-DELAY / COMMUNICATING substates and the T_CRA + T_DELAY retry timers, separate from HSMS connection state. |
| Dynamic Event Report Configuration | ✅ | E30 §6.6 | S2F33/F34, S2F35/F36, S2F37/F38 | Full Define-Report / Link-Event / Enable-Event pipeline with all four ack enums. |
| Variable Data Collection | ✅ | E30 §6.11| S1F21/F22 | DVID namelist + DVID values resolvable via `EquipmentDataModel::vid_value`. |
| Trace Data Collection | ✅ | E30 §6.12| S2F23/F24, S6F1/F2 | `TraceStore` keeps active TRID→TraceConfig; periodic sampling left to the application's scheduler. |
| Status Data Collection | ✅ | E30 §6.13| S1F3/F4, S1F11/F12 | |
| Alarm Management | ✅ | E30 §6.14| S5F1/F2, S5F3/F4, S5F5/F6, S5F7/F8 | Full set. ALCD bit-7 set/cleared, lower-7 category. |
| Remote Control | ✅ | E30 §6.15| S2F41/F42 | Full HCACK 7-value enum + per-parameter CPACKs. |
| Equipment Constants | ✅ | E30 §6.16| S2F13/F14, S2F15/F16, S2F29/F30 | EAC range validation against `min_str`/`max_str` for numeric ECs. |
| Process Program Management | ✅ | E30 §6.17| S7F3/F4, S7F5/F6, S7F19/F20 | Unformatted PP send/request/list — the minimum E30 GEM requires. (E42 *enhanced* PP is a separate SEMI standard; see §7.) |
| Material Movement | 🟡 | E30 §6.18| — | Process Job + Control Job lifecycle covered via E40/E94 (see §4a). Carrier (E87) and substrate (E90) still out of scope. |
| Equipment Terminal Services | ✅ | E30 §6.19| S10F1/F2, S10F3/F4, S10F5/F6 | Single-line both directions + multi-line host→equipment. S10F7 broadcast intentionally omitted (rarely used). |
| Clock | ✅ | E30 §6.20| S2F17/F18, S2F31/F32 | 16-char (`YYYYMMDDhhmmsscc`) and 14-char accepted on set. |
| Limits Monitoring | ✅ | E30 §6.21| S2F45/F46, S2F47/F48 | `LimitMonitorStore` keyed by VID with multiple `LimitDefinition` (LIMITID + upper/lower as arbitrary Items). |
| Spooling | ✅ | E30 §6.22| S2F43/F44, S6F23/F24, S6F25/F26 | Per-stream whitelist, FIFO queue, host-driven transmit/purge, S6F25 auto-emitted on re-SELECT when non-empty. |
| Control | ✅ | E30 §6.2 | — | See Fundamental. |
---
## 4a. E40 Process Jobs + E94 Control Jobs (GEM300)
The first GEM300 extension landing on the spec-as-data architecture.
Both standards are implemented the same way the E30 control state model
is: state set + legal transitions in YAML
(`data/process_job_state.yaml`, `data/control_job_state.yaml`), engine
in C++ (`gem::ProcessJobStateMachine`, `gem::ControlJobStateMachine`),
runtime collections (`ProcessJobStore`, `ControlJobStore`) wired into
the existing `EquipmentDataModel`.
| Capability | Status | Spec ref | Messages | Notes |
|---------------------------------------|--------|----------|----------|-------|
| E40 PJ state model | ✅ | E40 §6.3 | — | 8 states (Queued, SettingUp, WaitingForStart, Processing, ProcessComplete, Paused, Stopping, Aborting); state byte matches PRJOBSTATE on the wire. |
| E40 PRJobCreate | ✅ | E40 §10.2| S16F11/F12 | Body simplified to <L,3 PRJOBID PPID L,n MTRLOUTSPEC>; MF/PRRECIPEMETHOD/PRPROCESSPARAMS are documented as YAML-extension points. PPID validated against `RecipeStore`. |
| E40 PRJobDequeue | ✅ | E40 §10.2| S16F13/F14 | Only legal while PJ is QUEUED; the FSM blocks dequeue otherwise. |
| E40 PRJobCommand | ✅ | E40 §10.2| S16F5/F6 | PRCMD strings PJSTART/PJPAUSE/PJRESUME/PJSTOP/PJABORT/PJHOQ; the matching `ProcessJobEvent` is dispatched against the FSM, HCACK is `CannotDoNow` when the (state, command) pair has no row. |
| E40 PRJobAlert | ✅ | E40 §10.3| S16F9 | Equipment-initiated one-way (W=0). Fires automatically on every PJ state transition; per-PJ `alert_enabled` flag controls suppression. |
| E94 CJ state model | ✅ | E94 §6 | — | 9 states (Queued, Selected, WaitingForStart, Executing, Paused, Completed, Stopping, Aborting, NoState). CJ owns an ordered `prjobids` list. |
| E94 CreateObject (CJ) | ✅ | E94 §6.4 | S14F9/F10 | Body simplified to <L,2 CTLJOBID L,n PRJOBIDs>; full generic E14 ObjectService form is a YAML extension. OBJACK enum covers Success/Error + the four `Denied_*` cases. |
| E94 DeleteObject (CJ) | ✅ | E94 §6.4 | S14F11/F12 | |
| E94 CJobCommand | ✅ | E94 §6.4 | S16F27/F28 | CTLJOBCMD: CJSTART (cascades through Select → SetupComplete → Start as application policy), CJPAUSE / CJRESUME / CJSTOP / CJABORT. |
| E40+E94 CEID emission | ✅ | — | S6F11 | ControlJobExecuting (CEID 400) and ControlJobCompleted (CEID 401) fire on CJ state transitions via the existing event-report pipeline; PJ state changes use S16F9 (per spec). |
The demo's `run_cj_lifecycle` cascade — on CJSTART the CJ steps Queued
→ Selected → WaitingForStart → Executing and every contained PJ steps
through SettingUp → WaitingForStart → Processing → ProcessComplete —
is **application policy**, not the FSM. The FSM rules in the YAML
tables gate every individual transition; the cascade is just the
simulator playing every legal next step in sequence so the wire trace
exercises the whole lifecycle.
What's **out of scope for the E40/E94 first pass** (deliberate; all are
YAML/handler extensions, not surgery):
- Full E40 S16F11 body (MF / PRRECIPEMETHOD / RCPSPEC / PRPROCESSPARAMS).
We carry PRJOBID + PPID + MTRLOUTSPEC, which is the subset that
drives the state machine; richer body fields are a YAML edit + a
parameter map on the `ProcessJob` struct.
- S16F15/F16 PRJobCreateMultiple, S16F17/F18 PRJobMultipleDequeue.
- E14 generic ObjectService form. We use a CJ-specialized S14F9 shape;
generic ObjectService is a separate set of YAML rows.
- E87 Carrier Management and E90 Substrate Tracking — Layer 5
continues there per `implementation_plan.md`.
---
## 5. Message coverage matrix
| Pair | Direction | Status | Implemented in | Tested |
|------------------|-----------|--------|----------------|--------|
| S1F1 / S1F2 | H↔E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo |
| S1F3 / S1F4 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo |
| S1F11 / S1F12 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo |
| S1F13 / S1F14 | H↔E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo |
| S1F15 / S1F16 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo |
| S1F17 / S1F18 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo |
| S1F19 / S1F20 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo |
| S1F21 / S1F22 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo |
| S2F13 / S2F14 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo |
| S2F15 / S2F16 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip |
| S2F17 / S2F18 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo |
| S2F23 / S2F24 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip |
| S2F25 / S2F26 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip (loopback diagnostic) |
| S2F29 / S2F30 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo |
| S2F31 / S2F32 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo |
| S2F33 / S2F34 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo |
| S2F35 / S2F36 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo |
| S2F37 / S2F38 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo |
| S2F41 / S2F42 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo |
| S2F43 / S2F44 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo |
| S2F45 / S2F46 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip |
| S2F47 / S2F48 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip |
| S5F1 / S5F2 | E→H | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo |
| S5F3 / S5F4 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo |
| S5F5 / S5F6 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo |
| S5F7 / S5F8 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip |
| S5F9 / S5F10 | E→H | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip (exception post) |
| S5F11 / S5F12 | E→H | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip (exception clear) |
| S6F1 / S6F2 | E→H | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip |
| S6F11 / S6F12 | E→H | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo |
| S6F23 / S6F24 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo |
| S6F25 / S6F26 | E→H | ✅ | catalog + server | ✅ round-trip + auto-emitted on re-SELECT |
| S7F3 / S7F4 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip |
| S7F5 / S7F6 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo |
| S7F19 / S7F20 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo |
| S9F1 | E↔H | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip |
| S9F3 | E↔H | ✅ | catalog + Router wrapper | ✅ round-trip + auto-emitted on unknown stream |
| S9F5 | E↔H | ✅ | catalog + Router wrapper | ✅ round-trip + auto-emitted on unknown function |
| S9F7 | E↔H | ✅ | catalog + Connection | ✅ round-trip + auto-emitted on body decode |
| S9F9 | E↔H | ✅ | catalog + Connection | ✅ round-trip + auto-emitted on T3 timeout |
| S9F11 | E↔H | ✅ | catalog + Connection | ✅ round-trip + auto-emitted on oversized frame |
| S9F13 | E↔H | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip |
| S10F1 / S10F2 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo |
| S10F3 / S10F4 | E→H | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo |
| S10F5 / S10F6 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip |
| S14F9 / S14F10 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo (E94 CJ create) |
| S14F11 / S14F12 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo (E94 CJ delete) |
| S16F5 / S16F6 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip (E40 PRJobCommand) |
| S16F9 | E→H | ✅ | catalog + server | ✅ round-trip + auto-emitted per PJ transition (E40 PRJobAlert) |
| S16F11 / S16F12 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo (E40 PRJobCreate) |
| S16F13 / S16F14 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip (E40 PRJobDequeue) |
| S16F27 / S16F28 | H→E | ✅ | catalog | ✅ round-trip + demo (E94 CJobCommand) |
---
## 6. Demo evidence
The two-container demo (`docker compose up --no-deps server client`)
walks ~20 SECS transactions end-to-end:
1. TCP connect → `Select.req` → `Select.rsp(Ok)` → SELECTED on both sides.
2. `S1F13`/`S1F14` Establish Comms.
3. `S1F17`/`S1F18` Request Online; control state transitions
`HostOffline → AttemptOnline → OnlineRemote`.
4. `S1F19`/`S1F20` host fetches the equipment's GEM-compliance self-report.
5. `S1F21`/`S1F22` DVID namelist.
6. `S1F11`/`S1F12` SVID namelist → `S1F3`/`S1F4` values read.
7. `S2F29`/`S2F30` EC namelist → `S2F13`/`S2F14` EC read.
8. `S2F17`/`S2F18` clock read.
9. `S2F33`/`S2F34` Define Report 1000 over the 3 SVIDs.
10. `S2F35`/`S2F36` Link CEIDs 200 and 300 to Report 1000.
11. `S2F37`/`S2F38` Enable CEIDs 200, 300.
12. `S2F41`/`S2F42` host command **START** → server emits
`S6F11(CEID=300)` carrying the linked Report 1000 → host acks `S6F12`.
13. `S5F5`/`S5F6` list alarm directory.
14. `S5F3`/`S5F4` enable alarm 1.
15. `S2F41`/`S2F42` host command **FAULT** → server emits
`S5F1` (ALCD=0x84) + `S6F11(CEID=200)`.
16. Spool window: `SPOOL_ON` → `START` (emission goes to spool) →
`SPOOL_OFF` → `S6F23(Transmit)` → server drains queued S6F11 to host.
17. `S7F19`/`S7F20` recipe list, `S7F5`/`S7F6` fetch RECIPE-A.
18. `S16F11`/`S16F12` create Process Job `PJ-1` with PPID `RECIPE-A`.
19. `S14F9`/`S14F10` create Control Job `CJ-1` containing `[PJ-1]`.
20. `S16F27`/`S16F28` CJSTART → equipment cascades CJ Queued → Executing
and the contained PJ through SettingUp → WaitingForStart →
Processing → ProcessComplete, emitting one `S16F9 PRJobAlert` per PJ
transition and `S6F11(CEID=400)` / `S6F11(CEID=401)` for CJ Executing
/ Completed.
21. `S14F11`/`S14F12` delete `CJ-1`.
22. `S10F1`/`S10F2` host → equipment terminal display.
23. `S1F15`/`S1F16` Request Offline.
24. `Separate.req` → clean close on both sides.
Unit tests: **148 cases / 794 assertions pass** (`docker compose run --rm tests`).
The suite includes integration tests that drive a real `hsms::Connection`
over a loopback socket pair to verify the E37 §7.2 / §7.4 / §7.7
edge cases (Select.req while already SELECTED → AlreadyActive, Deselect.req
while NOT_SELECTED → NotEstablished, Reject.req for unsupported SType /
PType, Reject.req for data while NOT_SELECTED) — not just the happy path.
The E30 §6.5 Communication state machine is unit-tested independently of
the transport (timer firings simulated via test callbacks).
---
## 7. Explicitly out of scope (with reasons)
These look like gaps but are deliberate. None of them blocks the GEM
compliance claim.
| Item | Why it's out of scope |
|---------------------------------------|----------------------|
| Material Movement (E30 §6.18) | The job-management half is now in (E40 + E94, §4a). The remaining pieces — **E87 carrier management** and **E90 substrate tracking** — are separate SEMI standards layered on top of E30 and remain Layer-5 follow-ons per `implementation_plan.md`. |
| Multi-block SECS-I transfers | Multi-block (S6F5/F6, S6F7/F8 etc.) is a **SECS-I** concept for 244-byte serial frames. HSMS allows arbitrarily large bodies (up to the codebase's 16 MiB cap), so multi-block is structurally not needed. E37-based GEM equipment does not require it. |
| HSMS-GS (multi-session) | Out of scope — modern HSMS-SS covers virtually all current GEM equipment. |
| Equipment Processing States (concrete states) | E30 §6.3 says the specific states are tool-defined. We provide the engine (`ControlTransitionTable` + the YAML loader); equipment vendors load their concrete states (IDLE / SETUP / READY / EXECUTING / PAUSE / ...) the same way `data/control_state.yaml` is loaded today. Spec-compliant either way. |
| Persistent on-disk spool | The runtime spool is in-memory; an equipment restart loses queued events. Real fab equipment would back it with a journal. Standard does not mandate persistence. |
| E42 Enhanced Process Programs (S7F23–F26) | A separate SEMI standard. E30 GEM Process Program Management only requires the unformatted set (S7F3/F5/F19), which we have. |
| S10F7 Broadcast Terminal Display | Rarely used; equipment vendors typically forgo it. Not required for the Terminal Services capability. |
---
## 8. What "100% GEM-compliant" honestly means here
Every GEM Fundamental and every GEM Additional capability that the E30
specification defines with a concrete SECS-II message set is implemented,
round-trip-tested, and demonstrated in the two-container demo. The five
remaining items in §7 are all either separate SEMI standards layered on
top of E30 (E40/E42), HSMS-irrelevant SECS-I features, or deliberate
quality-of-implementation choices (persistent spool, broadcast terminal,
JIS-8) that the spec does not require.
What this codebase does **not** demonstrate, and what a real "GEM-compliant"
marketing claim would still need:
1. **Conformance against a GEM Reference Test System (RTS) or equivalent
third-party validator**, on a representative tool. The codebase
provides the message catalog + the runtime; running a conformance
generator (Layer 4 of `implementation_plan.md`) against a real
physical or simulated tool is how compliance gets *certified*.
2. **Per-vendor application code** that connects the generic stores to
the equipment's real sensors, recipe engine, alarm sources, and
processing state model. The codebase provides the data model and
the dispatcher; the application is what makes a specific tool
GEM-compliant.
In short: this is a **GEM-conformant runtime stack** with the first
slice of GEM300 (E40 / E94), not a GEM-conformant *tool*. Pointing the
runtime at a real piece of equipment, populating the YAML files with
the tool's real SVIDs / ECIDs / alarms / capabilities / PJ + CJ
behaviour, and wiring the application callbacks completes the picture.
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink