fc3422a4a9
Picks up the file renames that landed alongside the previous commit and fixes everything that pointed at the old root locations: - README.md doc-map updated: every entry now points at docs/X.md, with a new "docs/" lead entry pointing at the guided-tour index. - README inline cross-refs (ARCHITECTURE / INTEGRATION / SECURITY / BENCHMARKS / MES_INTEROP / PROOFS) repointed to docs/. - README "Interop" section rewritten — used to mention only secsgem-py; now covers all four external validators (secsgem-py 31 / secs4java8 55 / tshark 69 frames / libFuzzer 200 k+ runs) with a one-line summary each, plus pointers to interop/README.md and docs/VERIFICATION.md. - README "Deferred follow-ups" cleaned: dropped the explanatory "Listed here so reviewers don't go looking for them in COMPLIANCE.md and find an 'out of scope' entry that sounds defensive" sentence — the section header speaks for itself. - docs/00_index.md "Where the rest of the docs live" table: dropped every `../` prefix since the docs are now siblings. - docs/01_what_is_secs_gem.md PROOFS reference updated to sibling. - docs/02_the_cast.md INTEGRATION + MES_INTEROP refs updated to siblings; dropped the stale "at the repo root" wording. - interop/README.md: VERIFICATION + PROOFS refs updated to ../docs/X.md; stale "~24 + 4 checks" updated to 31 (matches PROOFS.md and README). - examples/pvd_tool/README.md: every doc cross-ref now points at ../../docs/X.md. - Source / data / CI comments mentioning doc names (e.g. "INTEGRATION.md §3", "COMPLIANCE.md gap") rewritten to "docs/INTEGRATION.md §3" etc. — affects 9 files across include/, apps/, tests/, data/, examples/, .gitea/workflows/. Verified: full build under docker passes, 445/445 test cases pass, 2 753/2 753 assertions pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
159 lines
7.1 KiB
Markdown
159 lines
7.1 KiB
Markdown
# ACME-PVD-3000 — worked vendor example
|
|
|
|
A fictional Physical Vapor Deposition tool, end-to-end. This is what
|
|
a real tool integrator's deployment looks like:
|
|
|
|
- `equipment.yaml` — the tool's data dictionary (29 SVIDs, 5 DVIDs,
|
|
7 ECIDs, 21 CEIDs, 12 alarms, 3 recipes, 9 host commands)
|
|
- `main.cpp` — the vendor application: sensor simulator, recipe
|
|
runner, alarm threshold monitor, EPT cycling, metrics exporter,
|
|
Router handlers wiring it all to the wire.
|
|
|
|
If you're starting a real integration, **fork these two files** and
|
|
customize. They're written to be a template, not an abstract demo.
|
|
|
|
## What it demonstrates
|
|
|
|
| Section in main.cpp | What it shows you how to do |
|
|
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| §1 Helpers + constants | The few `kSvidX / kCeidX` constants worth pinning at file scope |
|
|
| §2 Sensor simulator | Multi-cadence sensor poll loops (10 Hz pressure, 1 Hz temps), with the `asio::post`-onto-strand thread-safety pattern |
|
|
| §3 Recipe runner | Driving a PJ through SettingUp → Processing → ProcessComplete by walking the recipe body, with per-step CEID emission |
|
|
| §4 Alarm threshold monitor | Continuous threshold-based alarm logic (chamber pressure, cleaning interval) with set/clear emission |
|
|
| §5 EPT cycling | E116 state transitions driven by PJ state + safety alarms |
|
|
| §6 Router handlers | Every SECS/GEM message a host might send to a PVD tool, 51 handlers in ~460 lines |
|
|
| §7 main() | Loading YAML → validating → composing → running, including the Prometheus exporter on `:9090` (§7.3) |
|
|
|
|
## Running it
|
|
|
|
From repo root:
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
# Validate the configs (this is what your CI should do).
|
|
docker compose run --rm builder /app/build/secs_server --validate-config \
|
|
--config /app/examples/pvd_tool/equipment.yaml \
|
|
--state-table /app/data/control_state.yaml \
|
|
--pj-state-table /app/data/process_job_state.yaml \
|
|
--cj-state-table /app/data/control_job_state.yaml
|
|
|
|
# Start the tool.
|
|
docker compose run --rm builder /app/build/pvd_tool \
|
|
/app/examples/pvd_tool/equipment.yaml \
|
|
/app/data/control_state.yaml \
|
|
5000 \
|
|
9090
|
|
|
|
# In another shell, drive it with the conformance harness or a real host.
|
|
docker compose run --rm builder /app/build/secs_conformance \
|
|
--host 127.0.0.1 --port 5000 --device 0
|
|
# 47 / 47 checks passed
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Or via Docker Compose if you'd rather wire it as a service.
|
|
|
|
## What the host sees
|
|
|
|
Once a host connects and SELECTs:
|
|
|
|
1. **S1F1 → S1F2** returns `MDLN="ACME-PVD-3000"`, `SOFTREV="1.4.2"`.
|
|
2. **S1F3** on the 32 SVIDs returns live sensor readings — chamber
|
|
pressure tracks the simulator's target (default 1e-7 Torr in
|
|
idle), wafer counter increments per processed PJ, EPT state
|
|
gauge says `Standby`.
|
|
3. **S2F33/F35/F37** binds dynamic event reports; CEIDs 300 / 301 /
|
|
310 / 311 fire on real PJ activity.
|
|
4. **S2F41 RCMD=START** kicks the recipe runner: any PJ in
|
|
WaitingForStart transitions to Processing and the simulator
|
|
starts tracking the recipe's step targets. Sensor values change
|
|
in real time. CEID 300 (ProcessStarted) emits, then per-step
|
|
CEID 310/311, then CEID 301 (ProcessCompleted) on completion.
|
|
5. **S2F41 RCMD=FAULT** sets alarm 4 → S5F1 emitted (if enabled
|
|
via S5F3 first).
|
|
6. **S7F19** lists the 3 recipes; **S7F5** returns the body
|
|
(multi-line STEP definitions).
|
|
7. **S16F11** (PJ create) + **S14F9** (CJ create) + **S16F27**
|
|
(CJSTART) drives the full E40/E94 lifecycle.
|
|
|
|
## What's the same as the secs-gem demo server
|
|
|
|
`apps/secs_server.cpp` (used by `docker compose up server`) is the
|
|
canonical fully-loaded server. This example is structurally a
|
|
slimmer fork:
|
|
|
|
- Same Router pattern (`gem::Router` + `router.on(s, f, [...])`)
|
|
- Same event/alarm emission helpers (`deliver_or_spool`,
|
|
`emit_event`, `emit_alarm_set`)
|
|
- Same control-state-change handler wiring
|
|
|
|
What this example adds that the demo doesn't:
|
|
|
|
- **Sensor simulator** with multi-cadence poll loops. The demo's
|
|
SVID values stay at their YAML defaults; PVD's drift toward
|
|
recipe-step targets.
|
|
- **Recipe runner** that parses the recipe body and drives the PJ
|
|
FSM step-by-step. The demo's RCMD=START just emits the linked
|
|
CEID; PVD actually walks the recipe.
|
|
- **Alarm threshold monitor** — continuous evaluation of sensor
|
|
values against ECID setpoints. The demo only fires alarms when
|
|
RCMD=FAULT is sent.
|
|
- **EPT cycling** — automatic Standby↔Productive↔UnscheduledDowntime
|
|
based on PJ + alarm state. The demo doesn't cycle EPT.
|
|
- **Prometheus metrics exporter** on a second port. The demo logs
|
|
but doesn't export.
|
|
|
|
If you want one of these patterns in your own tool, lift the code
|
|
from `main.cpp` directly — each section is independently usable.
|
|
|
|
## What's not here
|
|
|
|
- **Persistence.** The demo server's `--spool-dir` flag is the
|
|
pattern to copy. Add `model->spool.enable_persistence(...)` etc.
|
|
at startup before binding the port. See
|
|
[`docs/INTEGRATION.md`](../../docs/INTEGRATION.md) §5.
|
|
- **E84 handshake timers.** No load-port AMHS wiring; see
|
|
[`docs/INTEGRATION.md`](../../docs/INTEGRATION.md) §4.6 for the
|
|
`E84AsioTimers` adapter.
|
|
- **Real I/O bridges.** Sensor values come from a random-walk
|
|
simulator. A real PVD tool would have a PLC/serial driver
|
|
module-bridge feeding `model->svids.set_value(...)` from real
|
|
hardware.
|
|
- **Production deployment hardening** —
|
|
[`docs/SECURITY.md`](../../docs/SECURITY.md) (nftables, stunnel,
|
|
minisign signing) and
|
|
[`docs/INTEGRATION.md`](../../docs/INTEGRATION.md) §7 (HA pattern).
|
|
|
|
## What you'd change for *your* tool
|
|
|
|
1. **Replace `equipment.yaml`** with your tool's actual SVIDs,
|
|
ECIDs, alarms, recipes. Run
|
|
`secs_server --validate-config` after every edit.
|
|
2. **Replace the sensor simulator** (`pvd::Simulator`) with calls
|
|
into your real hardware driver. Keep the `asio::post` pattern
|
|
for cross-thread updates.
|
|
3. **Replace the recipe runner** with your real recipe engine
|
|
integration. The shape — fire `Start`, walk steps, fire
|
|
`ProcessComplete` — is the contract; the implementation is
|
|
yours.
|
|
4. **Replace the alarm threshold monitor** with your real
|
|
alarm sources (sensor interrupts, watchdog timers, hardware
|
|
fault lines). Same `emit_alarm_set / emit_alarm_clear` API.
|
|
5. **Keep most of the Router handler section** — those are spec-
|
|
defined and you'll need them all in production.
|
|
|
|
That's it. No framework, no DI container, no abstract base
|
|
classes. ~1,100 lines of vendor code on top of the library.
|
|
|
|
## Cross-references
|
|
|
|
- [`docs/INTEGRATION.md`](../../docs/INTEGRATION.md) — the conceptual
|
|
tutorial this example concretizes
|
|
- [`docs/ARCHITECTURE.md`](../../docs/ARCHITECTURE.md) — how stores
|
|
compose, how to extend
|
|
- [`docs/BENCHMARKS.md`](../../docs/BENCHMARKS.md) — what the
|
|
throughput envelope looks like
|
|
- [`docs/SECURITY.md`](../../docs/SECURITY.md) — production hardening
|
|
configs
|
|
- [`apps/secs_server.cpp`](../../apps/secs_server.cpp) — the demo
|
|
server's fully-loaded Router (every handler PVD inherits + a
|
|
few more)
|