Files
secs-gem/examples/pvd_tool/README.md
T
raphael fc3422a4a9 docs: move root .md files into docs/ + update every reference
Picks up the file renames that landed alongside the previous commit
and fixes everything that pointed at the old root locations:

- README.md doc-map updated: every entry now points at docs/X.md,
  with a new "docs/" lead entry pointing at the guided-tour index.
- README inline cross-refs (ARCHITECTURE / INTEGRATION / SECURITY /
  BENCHMARKS / MES_INTEROP / PROOFS) repointed to docs/.
- README "Interop" section rewritten — used to mention only
  secsgem-py; now covers all four external validators (secsgem-py
  31 / secs4java8 55 / tshark 69 frames / libFuzzer 200 k+ runs)
  with a one-line summary each, plus pointers to interop/README.md
  and docs/VERIFICATION.md.
- README "Deferred follow-ups" cleaned: dropped the explanatory
  "Listed here so reviewers don't go looking for them in
  COMPLIANCE.md and find an 'out of scope' entry that sounds
  defensive" sentence — the section header speaks for itself.
- docs/00_index.md "Where the rest of the docs live" table: dropped
  every `../` prefix since the docs are now siblings.
- docs/01_what_is_secs_gem.md PROOFS reference updated to sibling.
- docs/02_the_cast.md INTEGRATION + MES_INTEROP refs updated to
  siblings; dropped the stale "at the repo root" wording.
- interop/README.md: VERIFICATION + PROOFS refs updated to
  ../docs/X.md; stale "~24 + 4 checks" updated to 31 (matches
  PROOFS.md and README).
- examples/pvd_tool/README.md: every doc cross-ref now points at
  ../../docs/X.md.
- Source / data / CI comments mentioning doc names (e.g.
  "INTEGRATION.md §3", "COMPLIANCE.md gap") rewritten to
  "docs/INTEGRATION.md §3" etc. — affects 9 files across
  include/, apps/, tests/, data/, examples/, .gitea/workflows/.

Verified: full build under docker passes, 445/445 test cases pass,
2 753/2 753 assertions pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-09 19:36:27 +02:00

159 lines
7.1 KiB
Markdown

# ACME-PVD-3000 — worked vendor example
A fictional Physical Vapor Deposition tool, end-to-end. This is what
a real tool integrator's deployment looks like:
- `equipment.yaml` — the tool's data dictionary (29 SVIDs, 5 DVIDs,
7 ECIDs, 21 CEIDs, 12 alarms, 3 recipes, 9 host commands)
- `main.cpp` — the vendor application: sensor simulator, recipe
runner, alarm threshold monitor, EPT cycling, metrics exporter,
Router handlers wiring it all to the wire.
If you're starting a real integration, **fork these two files** and
customize. They're written to be a template, not an abstract demo.
## What it demonstrates
| Section in main.cpp | What it shows you how to do |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| §1 Helpers + constants | The few `kSvidX / kCeidX` constants worth pinning at file scope |
| §2 Sensor simulator | Multi-cadence sensor poll loops (10 Hz pressure, 1 Hz temps), with the `asio::post`-onto-strand thread-safety pattern |
| §3 Recipe runner | Driving a PJ through SettingUp → Processing → ProcessComplete by walking the recipe body, with per-step CEID emission |
| §4 Alarm threshold monitor | Continuous threshold-based alarm logic (chamber pressure, cleaning interval) with set/clear emission |
| §5 EPT cycling | E116 state transitions driven by PJ state + safety alarms |
| §6 Router handlers | Every SECS/GEM message a host might send to a PVD tool, 51 handlers in ~460 lines |
| §7 main() | Loading YAML → validating → composing → running, including the Prometheus exporter on `:9090` (§7.3) |
## Running it
From repo root:
```bash
# Validate the configs (this is what your CI should do).
docker compose run --rm builder /app/build/secs_server --validate-config \
--config /app/examples/pvd_tool/equipment.yaml \
--state-table /app/data/control_state.yaml \
--pj-state-table /app/data/process_job_state.yaml \
--cj-state-table /app/data/control_job_state.yaml
# Start the tool.
docker compose run --rm builder /app/build/pvd_tool \
/app/examples/pvd_tool/equipment.yaml \
/app/data/control_state.yaml \
5000 \
9090
# In another shell, drive it with the conformance harness or a real host.
docker compose run --rm builder /app/build/secs_conformance \
--host 127.0.0.1 --port 5000 --device 0
# 47 / 47 checks passed
```
Or via Docker Compose if you'd rather wire it as a service.
## What the host sees
Once a host connects and SELECTs:
1. **S1F1 → S1F2** returns `MDLN="ACME-PVD-3000"`, `SOFTREV="1.4.2"`.
2. **S1F3** on the 32 SVIDs returns live sensor readings — chamber
pressure tracks the simulator's target (default 1e-7 Torr in
idle), wafer counter increments per processed PJ, EPT state
gauge says `Standby`.
3. **S2F33/F35/F37** binds dynamic event reports; CEIDs 300 / 301 /
310 / 311 fire on real PJ activity.
4. **S2F41 RCMD=START** kicks the recipe runner: any PJ in
WaitingForStart transitions to Processing and the simulator
starts tracking the recipe's step targets. Sensor values change
in real time. CEID 300 (ProcessStarted) emits, then per-step
CEID 310/311, then CEID 301 (ProcessCompleted) on completion.
5. **S2F41 RCMD=FAULT** sets alarm 4 → S5F1 emitted (if enabled
via S5F3 first).
6. **S7F19** lists the 3 recipes; **S7F5** returns the body
(multi-line STEP definitions).
7. **S16F11** (PJ create) + **S14F9** (CJ create) + **S16F27**
(CJSTART) drives the full E40/E94 lifecycle.
## What's the same as the secs-gem demo server
`apps/secs_server.cpp` (used by `docker compose up server`) is the
canonical fully-loaded server. This example is structurally a
slimmer fork:
- Same Router pattern (`gem::Router` + `router.on(s, f, [...])`)
- Same event/alarm emission helpers (`deliver_or_spool`,
`emit_event`, `emit_alarm_set`)
- Same control-state-change handler wiring
What this example adds that the demo doesn't:
- **Sensor simulator** with multi-cadence poll loops. The demo's
SVID values stay at their YAML defaults; PVD's drift toward
recipe-step targets.
- **Recipe runner** that parses the recipe body and drives the PJ
FSM step-by-step. The demo's RCMD=START just emits the linked
CEID; PVD actually walks the recipe.
- **Alarm threshold monitor** — continuous evaluation of sensor
values against ECID setpoints. The demo only fires alarms when
RCMD=FAULT is sent.
- **EPT cycling** — automatic Standby↔Productive↔UnscheduledDowntime
based on PJ + alarm state. The demo doesn't cycle EPT.
- **Prometheus metrics exporter** on a second port. The demo logs
but doesn't export.
If you want one of these patterns in your own tool, lift the code
from `main.cpp` directly — each section is independently usable.
## What's not here
- **Persistence.** The demo server's `--spool-dir` flag is the
pattern to copy. Add `model->spool.enable_persistence(...)` etc.
at startup before binding the port. See
[`docs/INTEGRATION.md`](../../docs/INTEGRATION.md) §5.
- **E84 handshake timers.** No load-port AMHS wiring; see
[`docs/INTEGRATION.md`](../../docs/INTEGRATION.md) §4.6 for the
`E84AsioTimers` adapter.
- **Real I/O bridges.** Sensor values come from a random-walk
simulator. A real PVD tool would have a PLC/serial driver
module-bridge feeding `model->svids.set_value(...)` from real
hardware.
- **Production deployment hardening** —
[`docs/SECURITY.md`](../../docs/SECURITY.md) (nftables, stunnel,
minisign signing) and
[`docs/INTEGRATION.md`](../../docs/INTEGRATION.md) §7 (HA pattern).
## What you'd change for *your* tool
1. **Replace `equipment.yaml`** with your tool's actual SVIDs,
ECIDs, alarms, recipes. Run
`secs_server --validate-config` after every edit.
2. **Replace the sensor simulator** (`pvd::Simulator`) with calls
into your real hardware driver. Keep the `asio::post` pattern
for cross-thread updates.
3. **Replace the recipe runner** with your real recipe engine
integration. The shape — fire `Start`, walk steps, fire
`ProcessComplete` — is the contract; the implementation is
yours.
4. **Replace the alarm threshold monitor** with your real
alarm sources (sensor interrupts, watchdog timers, hardware
fault lines). Same `emit_alarm_set / emit_alarm_clear` API.
5. **Keep most of the Router handler section** — those are spec-
defined and you'll need them all in production.
That's it. No framework, no DI container, no abstract base
classes. ~1,100 lines of vendor code on top of the library.
## Cross-references
- [`docs/INTEGRATION.md`](../../docs/INTEGRATION.md) — the conceptual
tutorial this example concretizes
- [`docs/ARCHITECTURE.md`](../../docs/ARCHITECTURE.md) — how stores
compose, how to extend
- [`docs/BENCHMARKS.md`](../../docs/BENCHMARKS.md) — what the
throughput envelope looks like
- [`docs/SECURITY.md`](../../docs/SECURITY.md) — production hardening
configs
- [`apps/secs_server.cpp`](../../apps/secs_server.cpp) — the demo
server's fully-loaded Router (every handler PVD inherits + a
few more)