End-to-end guide for an equipment vendor integrating the library
into a real semiconductor tool:
1. Architecture: what the runtime provides vs what the application
contributes — three boundary classes (EquipmentDataModel,
Router, hsms::Connection).
2. 30-minute first connection: YAML + minimal main() + run.
3. Wiring real sensors to SVIDs.
4. Plugging the FSMs into the tool: EPT, carriers, substrates,
E40 PJ / E94 CJ, alarms, recoverable exceptions.
5. Persistence: enable_persistence(dir) per store, storage budget,
replay semantics, current caveats.
6. Monitoring + observability: connection lifecycle hooks,
state-change handlers, S9 protocol errors.
7. Recommended deployment layout (/opt/acme-secsgem/...).
8. Integration testing checklist.
9. When to extend the runtime.
10. The honest gap between "this stack runs" and "this is a
certified GEM tool".
Cross-referenced from COMPLIANCE.md §9 distinction (stack vs tool).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
secs-gem
A C++20 SECS-II / HSMS / GEM client and server, fully containerised, with every behavioural rule encoded as YAML data (control state, equipment data dictionary, SECS-II message shapes, E40 process-job + E94 control-job state machines).
See COMPLIANCE.md for the per-capability E5/E30/E37/E40/E94 audit. Every GEM Fundamental and every GEM Additional capability that E30 binds to a concrete SECS-II message set is implemented and round-trip-tested; E40 PJ and E94 CJ lifecycle messages (S16F5/F6/F9/F11/F12/F13/F14/F27/F28 and S14F9/F10/F11/F12) are wired through the same data-driven runtime.
Quick start
Everything runs in Docker — no compiler or build tools on the host.
docker compose run --rm builder # configure + compile
docker compose run --rm tests # 148 test cases / 794 assertions
docker compose up --no-deps server client # live two-container demo
Architecture
The project is "spec-as-data": the SEMI behavioural rules live in YAML; the C++ is the engine that reads them.
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ data/ │
│ messages.yaml SECS-II message catalog │
│ control_state.yaml E30 §6.2 control transition table │
│ process_job_state.yaml E40 §6 PJ transition table │
│ control_job_state.yaml E94 §6 CJ transition table │
│ equipment.yaml SVIDs / DVIDs / ECIDs / CEIDs / │
│ alarms / recipes / commands / │
│ capabilities / spool / DVID list │
└──────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────────────┘
│ (loaded at startup, codegened at build)
▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ tools/gen_messages.py │
│ reads messages.yaml -> emits generated/secsgem/gem/messages.hpp
└──────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ apps/ │
│ secs_server.cpp passive equipment │
│ secs_client.cpp active host │
│ (both use gem::Router for dispatch) │
└────────────┬───────────────────────────┬─────────────────────┘
│ │
▼ ▼
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ secsgem::config loader.hpp: YAML -> tables + data model │
│ secsgem::gem ControlTransitionTable + ControlStateMachine,│
│ ProcessJobStateMachine (E40), │
│ ControlJobStateMachine (E94), │
│ EquipmentDataModel composing the stores: │
│ SVID, DVID, ECID, Event Subscriptions, │
│ Alarms, Recipes, Clock, Commands, Spool, │
│ Limits, Traces, ProcessJobs, ControlJobs │
│ Router (stream, function) -> handler │
│ generated messages.hpp (all 44 SxFy) │
│ secsgem::hsms Connection (Asio), Header, Frame, Timers │
│ Auto-emits S9F3/F5/F7/F9/F11 on protocol │
│ error conditions. │
│ secsgem::secs2 Item (variant), encode/decode, Message │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Tree
secs-gem/
├── Dockerfile, docker-compose.yml # toolchain + demo
├── CMakeLists.txt
├── implementation_plan.md # 7-layer spec-as-data roadmap
├── COMPLIANCE.md # per-capability E5/E30/E37 audit
├── data/
│ ├── messages.yaml # SECS-II message catalog
│ ├── control_state.yaml # E30 control state transitions
│ └── equipment.yaml # equipment data dictionary
├── tools/
│ └── gen_messages.py # codegen (messages.yaml -> .hpp)
├── include/secsgem/
│ ├── secs2/{item,codec,message}.hpp
│ ├── hsms/{header,connection}.hpp
│ ├── gem/{control_state,communication_state,data_model,messages_helpers,router}.hpp
│ ├── gem/{process_job_state,control_job_state}.hpp # E40 / E94 FSMs
│ ├── gem/store/ # one file per focused store:
│ │ ├── status_variables.hpp # SVIDs + DVIDs
│ │ ├── equipment_constants.hpp # ECIDs + EAC range validation
│ │ ├── event_reports.hpp # CEIDs + Reports + Links
│ │ ├── alarms.hpp # alarm registry
│ │ ├── recipes.hpp # process program store
│ │ ├── clock.hpp # 16-char TIME with offset
│ │ ├── host_commands.hpp # RCMD registry
│ │ ├── spool.hpp # spool queue + state
│ │ ├── limits.hpp # variable limit definitions
│ │ ├── trace.hpp # active trace configs
│ │ ├── process_jobs.hpp # E40 PJ collection
│ │ └── control_jobs.hpp # E94 CJ collection
│ ├── config/loader.hpp
│ └── endpoint.hpp
├── src/{secs2,hsms,gem,config}/*.cpp + endpoint.cpp
├── apps/{secs_server,secs_client}.cpp
└── tests/test_*.cpp
Adding a capability
The point of "spec-as-data" is that adding behaviour almost never requires a C++ change.
Add a new SVID
# data/equipment.yaml
svids:
- {id: 4, name: ChamberTemp, units: "C", type: U4, value: 25}
Restart the server. The host sees the new SVID via S1F11/F3 immediately.
Add a new host command with side effects
# data/equipment.yaml
host_commands:
- {name: VENT, ack: Accept, emit_ceid: 400, set_alarm: 2}
Add a new state transition
# data/control_state.yaml
transitions:
- {from: OnlineRemote, on: host_request_offline, to: EquipmentOffline, ack: Accept}
Add an E40 PJ transition (e.g. a tool-specific HOLD state)
# data/process_job_state.yaml
transitions:
- {from: Processing, on: hold, to: OnHold}
- {from: OnHold, on: resume, to: Processing}
(Adding a brand-new state requires bumping the ProcessJobState enum
in include/secsgem/gem/process_job_state.hpp too — it's the wire enum
that S16F9 carries.)
Add a new SECS-II message
# data/messages.yaml
- id: S6F30
stream: 6
function: 30
w: true
builder: s6f30_something
parser: parse_s6f30
body:
kind: list
struct_name: Something
fields:
- {name: field_a, shape: {kind: scalar, item_type: U4}}
- {name: field_b, shape: {kind: scalar, item_type: ASCII}}
docker compose run --rm builder regenerates messages.hpp. The
typed builder, parser, and struct definition appear automatically.
Demo
The two-container demo walks ~20 SECS transactions:
[host] -> Select.req [equip] <- Select.req
[host] == SELECTED == [equip] == SELECTED ==
[host] -> S1F13 W [equip] -> S1F14 (COMMACK=0)
[host] -> S1F17 W [equip] HostOffline -> AttemptOnline -> OnlineRemote
[host] -> S1F19 W [equip] -> S1F20 (12 capabilities)
[host] CCODE 1 Establish Communications
[host] CCODE 2 Dynamic Event Report Configuration
[host] ...
[host] CCODE 14 Spooling
[host] -> S1F21 W [equip] -> S1F22 (2 DVIDs)
[host] -> S1F11 W [equip] -> S1F12 (3 SVIDs)
[host] -> S1F3 W [equip] -> S1F4
[host] -> S2F29 W [equip] -> S2F30 (2 EC entries)
[host] -> S2F33/F35/F37 W [equip] subscribes CEIDs 200, 300
[host] -> S2F41 W START [equip] emit S6F11 CEID=300
[host] EVENT CEID=300 (1 reports)
[host] -> S5F5 W [equip] -> S5F6 (2 alarms)
[host] -> S5F3 W [equip] enables alarm 1
[host] -> S2F41 W FAULT [equip] emit S5F1 + S6F11 CEID=200
[host] ALARM SET ALID=1 cat=4 "Chiller Temp High"
[host] -> S2F41 W SPOOL_ON [equip] force_spool=true
[host] -> S2F41 W START spool: S6F11 CEID=300 queued
[host] -> S2F41 W SPOOL_OFF [equip] force_spool=false (depth=1)
[host] -> S6F23 W Transmit [equip] drains 1 spooled message
[host] EVENT CEID=300 (from spool, post-fact)
[host] -> S7F19 W [equip] -> S7F20 (2 PPIDs)
[host] -> S7F5 W RECIPE-A [equip] -> S7F6
[host] -> S16F11 W PJ-1 RECIPE-A [equip] -> S16F12 HCACK=0
[host] -> S14F9 W CJ-1 [PJ-1] [equip] -> S14F10 OBJACK=0
[host] -> S16F27 W CJ-1 CJSTART [equip] CJ Queued -> Executing
[host] <- S6F11 CEID=400 PJ Queued -> SettingUp
[host] <- S16F9 PJ-1 state=SettingUp PJ -> WaitingForStart
[host] <- S16F9 PJ-1 state=WaitingForStart PJ -> Processing
[host] <- S16F9 PJ-1 state=Processing PJ -> ProcessComplete
[host] <- S16F9 PJ-1 state=ProcessComplete CJ -> Completed
[host] <- S6F11 CEID=401
[host] -> S14F11 W CJ-1 [equip] -> S14F12 OBJACK=0
[host] -> S10F1 W [equip] TERMINAL[0] Hello equipment!
[host] -> S1F15 W [equip] OnlineRemote -> HostOffline
[host] -> Separate.req [equip] <- Separate.req
Build details
The toolchain image (Dockerfile) is Ubuntu 24.04 with g++-13, CMake,
Ninja, libasio-dev, libyaml-cpp-dev, and Python 3 for the codegen.
doctest is fetched via CMake FetchContent. Build artifacts live in a
named Docker volume so the host filesystem stays clean.
Standalone Asio is used in header-only mode (ASIO_STANDALONE). No
Boost dependency.